GophersInIowa
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 44,056
- Reaction score
- 26,537
- Points
- 113
Must be a slow day in wisconsin.
Yeah, you guys go ahead and 'rip' on Minnesota for being irrelevant the past 5-6 years.
Have fun.
Wisconsin is in a class of its own. They're the only Big Ten team to lose to a Rose Bowl to the MWC. Kudos.
False.
First of all, I highly doubt that you're even a Gopher fan, given that you have 7 posts and they're all on Thomas Hammock threads.
Next, if you've ever been to a Gopher game, you would know that the majority of the fans who sit between the 20s were alive and well the last time the Gophers won a national championship. Hell, most probably have kids who were alive themselves the last time the Gophers won a national championship. In fact, I would wager that there are more than a handful who have been alive for all 6 (which, last I checked, is greater than zero) of Minnesota's national championships.
As long as I have a breath in me, I will continue to lord Minnesota's dominance in football over both of its border rivals. Come talk to me when either Wisconsin or Iowa has 1 national title, let alone 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6.
5 or 6? Funniest thing I've read here in a while! Try 50 years.
Forgive us for not seeing "our time" of mediocrity coming. Remember all you jokers predicting the demise of Bielema and the rise of Brew? Laughable stuff then and now.
Formo, you know nothing about relevance. Unless we are discussing the 1940s.
Formo, you know nothing about relevance. Unless we are discussing the 1940s.
One of the better posts by a Becky fan in this thread. But let me dispute something quick.. The bolded: Sounds like something a bandwagoner says. I'm not calling you one, but that's what it comes across. The facts are while Wisconsin has been pretty good (but not good enough to beat a non-BCS school in the biggest Bowl game they've ever played) right now, Minnesota has a history worthy of chest-thumping. Even 50 years later.
Yeah, you guys go ahead and 'rip' on Minnesota for being irrelevant the past 5-6 years. You damn well know your time is coming too. Just remember during the time you guys are 'owning' the B1G that you'll never be able to compare your NC trophy case to ours. Just saying.
Have fun.
Hah! The past 5-6 years? Did you mean 50-60 years?
Seriously though, you guys are completely right. Any impartial observer would obviously say that Minnesota has the better football program...
An impartial observer would also say that fans who sit on a rivals' message board waiting for their chance to defend their team constantly are just very insecure and have no life. I seriously think some of you have some kind of software that alerts you every time "wisconsin", "badgers", or "becky" are mentioned on gopherhole so you can immediately come on here and defend your team.
I find this board incredibly entertaining, and occasionally a good B10 football discussion. You are right, I have no life and am incredibly insecure.
Thanks. Also the only Big Ten team to win back to back Rose Bowls.
You win some and you lose some.
Wisconsin is in a class of its own. They're the only Big Ten team to lose to a Rose Bowl to the MWC. Kudos.
Also, where can one find the overall head to head statistics for UM vs. UW? All I can find is a wikipedia page for Paul Bunyon's Axe, which didn't start til 1948. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Bunyan%27s_Axe
Minnesota went 11-3 while playing for the Slab of Bacon. So Wisconsin is 36-24-3 in the battle for Paul Bunyon's Axe (1948-2011) 3-11 for the Slab of Bacon (1930-1943), and 1-3 from '44 to '47. That makes it 40-38 since 1930. So yes, obviously Minnesota is a much superior football program. Thank god the game hasn't changed since pre-1930.
Hammock basically sums up all of Brewster's staff. The second he gets a "better" offer he jumps at it. Examples Withers to UNC, Roof to Auburn, Fisch to Seattle, and McDonald to Cleveland (I think). I'm glad he's gone if that's how he was going to look at his job here. I love the fact that Kill's staff is very sturdy and sticks with him through thick and thin.
Congratulations on your national championships.
Which school has the better football program?
Princeton
Harvard
Yale
Minnesota
The rationale in this thread would say that Minnesota is the worst of those 4 by a long shot. Gopher fans' argument for what defines a major program is just incredibly preposterous. It reminds me of arguments made in kindergarten.
But seriously, congrats on the National Championships. All said and done I would prefer Wisconsin to have 6 national championships than 0.
Congratulations on your national championships.
Which school has the better football program?
Princeton
Harvard
Yale
Minnesota
The rationale in this thread would say that Minnesota is the worst of those 4 by a long shot. Gopher fans' argument for what defines a major program is just incredibly preposterous. It reminds me of arguments made in kindergarten.
But seriously, congrats on the National Championships. All said and done I would prefer Wisconsin to have 6 national championships than 0.
And the most recent (1960) was awarded before Minnesota lost their Bowl game. I'm not sure 2 or 3 saw any legit NCs.
Did I ever mention, Wisconsin won a ton of Boxing NCs in the 30s and 40s? Yeah, I know. Who cares. Same with Gopher NCs that none of us saw.
This is the first of those that's not actually an upgrade, though. Plus, the rest of those were actually decent enough to leave in the offseason, not jump ship in the middle of a contract like B. Arnold.
It's an upgrade
and it is the offseason