RailBaronYarr
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,285
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
The game will never, ever, never be played outdoors. Never. It will never be in Minnesota. Never, ever. Indy and Detroit will be the only two spots with the current B1G4 line up. Don't fool yourself--the rest of the B1G4 and the rest of the country don't look at the Twin Cities any differently than they look at Indy, Des Moines, or Milwaukee. No chance the game is ever here.
So if the rest of the conference doesn't view Mpls any different than Indy, why would it matter if it's there or here? Distance? I'm sure Nebraska and Wisconsin fans wouldn't have minded a 6 hour drive vs 9 to Indy and Wisconsin fans a 4 vs 5 hour drive. If there are so many PSU, Michigan, OSU fans on the east coast (NYC, DC, Philly) as people say, they aren't driving to a BTCG anyway, they're flying. Flights to MSP are not much more expensive from DC/NYC to MSP than Indy. Finally, for the drivers, people are OK with Detroit as an option, making MN and NE fans potentially drive 11 hours but we're not ok with OSU fans driving 11.5 and PSU fans driving 14.5 to Mpls? Whatever.
I also disagree about perception. Perception may be that Mpls is cold (er than it really is), but I doubt anyone would say that Minneapolis-St Paul is the same as Des Moines or Indy as far as a traveler's destination goes. I think it would be a benefit to the conference if it rotated between areas of the Big Ten while remaining neutral (neutral stadiums) for attendance and fan experience. It also gives the different areas the ability to highlight their states. And if you want to spin the angle of increasing the Big Ten's image in the community, you get local non-team fans energized about BT football by getting them to the games. People in Indy are beat over the head with this way too many times a year to care now. Oh yeah, let's not forget about the economic benefits rotating between sites.