STrib: Why is Minnesota the last state with 3.2 beer?

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
60,798
Reaction score
16,218
Points
113
per STrib:

Ours is the only state left still acting like a Prohibition-era scold by restricting beer sales at grocery and convenience stores to those with 3.2 percent alcohol.

It’s enough to make a guy like Star Tribune reader David Infanger ask, “Why is Minnesota the last state to have 3.2 beer?”

It’s such a random number, Infanger said, and now that liquor stores are open seven days a week, why do we limit the alcohol content of beer sold at some places but not others?

His question landed here at Curious Minnesota, a Star Tribune feature powered by questions from readers


So, to make one thing clear, we are indeed the last state selling 3.2 beer specifically made to meet state restrictions, but we’re not the last state selling low-alcohol beer.

Many “light” beers would meet Minnesota’s 3.2 statute, which uses the old-fashioned “alcohol by weight” measurement. Using the more modern “alcohol by volume” measure, a so-called 3.2 beer is actually about 4 percent. Even lower are low-alcohol brews like Amstel Light or Miller 64.

The 3.2 beers specially made for grocery stores are a dying breed: Some brewers have dropped them altogether. But here, too, we’re the exception. The August Schell Brewing Co. in New Ulm still makes 3.2 for Schell’s and Grain Belt. And plenty of places in Minnesota serve 3.2: There are 1,484 active 3.2 bar licenses in Minnesota, according to state officials, from Pizza Hut of Mora to China Café of Duluth to the Rochester Athletic Club.

So why 3.2, and not some other low number?

The answer goes back to Prohibition’s repeal.

When popular support for prohibition dried up, politicians realized it might take years to undo the 18th amendment, so they looked for a shortcut. Prohibition outlawed “intoxicating liquor,” but it didn’t mention alcohol content. After hearing expert testimony from one T.C. Haffenreffer of Boston, who said 3.2 was the number brewers could hit and still make non-intoxicating beer, Congress acted swiftly and, well, here we are.

There’s still some debate over how 3.2 became the number, said beer historian Doug Hoverson, author of “The Drink that Made Wisconsin Famous.”


Go Gophers!!
 



Somehow, I would guess the state's cabal of distributors has a hand in it.

If it's some law to do with alcohol, that people hate and don't understand, it's usually them trying to control things and put money in their own pockets.

They have fought tooth and nail to try to prevent brewers from selling their own beer directly to consumers. Losing battle
 




Top Bottom