MNVCGUY
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2011
- Messages
- 20,000
- Reaction score
- 21,324
- Points
- 113
I thought everyone stayed at the games between sessions!? This is precisely the reason that both sites are the same from a traffic perspective. People come and go to the different events throughout the day (as they already do), eat at one of the MANY restaurants/bars close to the stadium in DT/SV, and either go back to another game or head home.
1 year. The LRT will be complete in 2013, with passenger service starting in 2014. The 2012 Prep Bowl is already being played at the Dome. I was never advocating to switch before the Dome becomes inoperable. Keep in mind that
More high school kids and college kids attend regular season football games outside than inside than pro football in Minnesota. This should make for a natural transition.
For the same reason the U wanted to play outdoor football. All weather is football weather, fans have proven time and again that for big games or events (late season college games, outdoor hockey, NHL hockey classics played outdoors, etc) that weather is not an issue for attendance. I will give another reason. Cost. The U could extend the offer to do this for free (as it is a marketing/advertising/fan building experience for themselves), splitting concessions and parking revenue with MSHSL, which is what I'd do.
The MSHSL absolutely would benefit from a strong collegiate, D1-level football program for the same reason that high school hockey in this state is strong in part as a result of strong hockey teams at the U of M and UND. A better relationship between the MSHSL and the U makes for a stronger commitment from athletes to the sport of football, fans being involved, and money for ticket sales at events like this. I guarantee you that football participation in states where the D1 program is big (think Nebraska, Iowa, Wisconsin, etc) is better than states where there is a lack of or or under-performing D1-school. Therefore, the MSHSL has more incentive to partner with a flagship D1 football program than a sports commission/pro sports team combination. Beyond that, this is an opportunity to embrace our state's weather as a defining characteristic for football the same way we do for Hockey Day with outdoor hockey. Football is meant to be played outdoors (one of the major marketing campaigns surrounding the building of TCF). If the Prep Bowl was in middle January, I might be siding with you.
If you are not advocating a move until the dome is inoperable then what the hell are we discussing this for. Did I mention I really don't care?