GophersInIowa
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 43,426
- Reaction score
- 25,444
- Points
- 113
Not to be confused with Spanford.
That's what I got. "Spanferd", as rhyming with transferred. Just odd...I thought the pronunciation on Saturday was closer to “Spanferd”.
The dude got Autman-Bell right but missed on the seemingly much easier Spann-Ford.
He also called our RB "Jelen Preston" on his TD run.I thought the pronunciation on Saturday was closer to “Spanferd”.
The dude got Autman-Bell right but missed on the seemingly much easier Spann-Ford.
I've been practicing with my speech therapist.Eventually, everyone will be able to say “Kaliakmanis”.
I've been practicing with my speech therapist.
Well if he can’t block he will end up on the bench again this year in big ten play. Hopefully he canI'm confused. I was told he couldn't block
/s
In all seriousness, it's awesome to see him start to realize the full potential everyone has talked about for years.
Well if he can’t block he will end up on the bench again this year in big ten play. Hopefully he can
You disagree he was on the bench last year?
If he's on the bench again in Big Ten play I really hope we can find another TE to make a few catches vs Wisconsin like Kieft did last year.You disagree he was on the bench last year?
Or do you agree he was on the bench but disagree with the reason why
It was Matt Millen, right? He sounded like he didn't prepare at all.I thought the pronunciation on Saturday was closer to “Spanferd”.
The dude got Autman-Bell right but missed on the seemingly much easier Spann-Ford.
It was Brock Vereen's partner - the play by play guy that he was paired with. I don't recall his name. I mean, he had to go out of his way to mispronounce "Spann-Ford". That one doesn't exactly present a tongue twister. I thought Brock did a decent job, I just wonder why he didn't set that straight with his partner on the side, or anyone else in the production team, for that matter.It was Matt Millen, right? He sounded like he didn't prepare at all.
I thought both Vereen and the play by play guy were awful, to the point of being unlistenable. Vereen's sucking up to everything Gopher was nauseating.It was Brock Vereen's partner - the play by play guy that he was paired with. I don't recall his name. I mean, he had to go out of his way to mispronounce "Spann-Ford". That one doesn't exactly present a tongue twister. I thought Brock did a decent job, I just wonder why he didn't set that straight with his partner on the side, or anyone else in the production team, for that matter.
You disagree he was on the bench last year?
Or do you agree he was on the bench but disagree with the reason why
My recollection is that he played a lot during the Big Ten games?
Ahh, OK. Millen must have been a different game I flipped to...I was speed watching the gophs game so didn't really listen to much of the commentary.It was Brock Vereen's partner - the play by play guy that he was paired with. I don't recall his name. I mean, he had to go out of his way to mispronounce "Spann-Ford". That one doesn't exactly present a tongue twister. I thought Brock did a decent job, I just wonder why he didn't set that straight with his partner on the side, or anyone else in the production team, for that matter.
He played a ton last year.You disagree he was on the bench last year?
Or do you agree he was on the bench but disagree with the reason why
This.He played a ton last year.
He played less than half the tight end and H snapsHe played a ton last year.
He played less than half the tight end and H snaps
I’m not sure why this is controversial to say.
He wasn’t a good enough blocker to supplant Kieft even with his superior receiving skills.
This is fact. It’s not controversial
You're wrong again. As I've explained to you multiple times, Ko Kieft played the U-TE position, which is mainly a blocking TE, while BSF played the Y-TE position, a more all-around TE, who typically catches more passes.He played less than half the tight end and H snaps
I’m not sure why this is controversial to say.
He wasn’t a good enough blocker to supplant Kieft even with his superior receiving skills.
This is fact. It’s not controversial
You're wrong again. As I've explained to you multiple times, Ko Kieft played the U-TE position, which is mainly a blocking TE, while BSF played the Y-TE position, a more all-around TE, who typically catches more passes.
It was Nick Kallerup who could not supplant Ko Kieft because he was the back-up at the U-TE position, not BSF.
This season Nick Kallerup is the main guy at the U-TE, while BSF continues o man his Y-TE position.
Define what "on the bench again this year in big ten play" means specifically? Was Ko Kieft "on the bench in big ten play" last year as well?.