GophersInIowa
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 43,422
- Reaction score
- 25,420
- Points
- 113
Also, I guess Kevin Warren has a son that plays in the SEC? It'll be interesting to see if he ends up playing.
Also, I guess Kevin Warren has a son that plays in the SEC? It'll be interesting to see if he ends up playing.
On that's on their football team ALONE: https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...players-were-positive-for-covid-19/113190172/....and Rutgers just announced they have 30 positive tests.
People complaining about their conferences delaying their fall sports should be applauding that the conferences put their respective communities, athletes and their family and friends health first instead of the almighty dollar.
....and Rutgers just announced they have 30 positive tests.
Also, I guess Kevin Warren has a son that plays in the SEC? It'll be interesting to see if he ends up playing.
Notre Dame has started reporting cases on their campus a week after students were let onto campus: https://here.nd.edu/our-approach/dashboard/
I believe you had to test negative to be allowed on campus initially. This thing spreads like wild fire and I think that's going to be the reason the other schools cancel. If you can't contain the spread on campus, you greatly reduce the ability to keep the football players healthy without a full bubble. If Notre Dame can't get it under control and other schools have similar problems, I think the liability causes the rest of the conferences to cave.
This is so much more than football and if you can't figure that out, there's no helping you. The Big10 and Pac12 recognize that they also have to do their part to protect folks from COVID19. Yes, liability is a big consideration and it always will be - nothing new there. Having a player be infected and spread to an at-risk teamate, friend, or family member is another. I guess if we would have taken the New Zealand approach to COVID19 we would all be looking forward to our Fall opener but it is all too much about ME in this country.
Sure thy did. The almighty dollar actually really helped drive this decision. They were very worried about the financial liability. As for player safety, I don't want to hear another word. I am all for making the players as safe as possible. But nobody can honestly claim 'player safety' was the reason and then turn around and say that we are going to ask them to play 22 games or whatever, over two separate seasons, in the course of less than 10 months. Talk about safety issues.
This is so much more than football and if you can't figure that out, there's no helping you. The Big10 and Pac12 recognize that they also have to do their part to protect folks from COVID19. Yes, liability is a big consideration and it always will be - nothing new there. Having a player be infected and spread to an at-risk teamate, friend, or family member is another. I guess if we would have taken the New Zealand approach to COVID19 we would all be looking forward to our Fall opener but it is all too much about ME in this country.
People complaining about their conferences delaying their fall sports should be applauding that the conferences put their respective communities, athletes and their family and friends health first instead of the almighty dollar.
Back at ya pal.You are 100% wrong and a douche.
yeah i agree on this subject matter. I think, in all honesty, some of this is caving to pressure to offer the "college experience" to justify charging the tuition they are. I get the claim it is at a lesser capacity but frankly, it's not like people are going to campus to socially distance, but rather to be social. I disagree with the idea of pulling people back to campus as well but that's just me (as well as feel that the charging of tuition at full price is absolute bs, but that's for another board).Before you applaud any institution for putting their communities health first.... you might want to see who is asking/requiring students to come back on campus for classes. I'm not against the season shutdown no matter how much I may or may not have cried when it happened. My question is how in the fvck can you say it's safe for students to return to dorms and classes and then say football is not safe and you need to shut down. That's my only gripe.
this is provided reinfection isn't a thing, which we don't know at this point (we think unlikely, but don't know as there haven't been controlled studies proving cessation of infection then re-exposure for second infection).Underscores the likelihood many, perhaps most that age will contract it unless they lock themselves in the basement. This thing is pretty contagious, the kids feel invulnerable, and there is a need for socializing.
I’ll guess by, I don’t know, early October in that particular cohort the virus will have pretty much burned itself out.
yeah i agree on this subject matter. I think, in all honesty, some of this is caving to pressure to offer the "college experience" to justify charging the tuition they are. I get the claim it is at a lesser capacity but frankly, it's not like people are going to campus to socially distance, but rather to be social. I disagree with the idea of pulling people back to campus as well but that's just me (as well as feel that the charging of tuition at full price is absolute bs, but that's for another board).
HA!!!! Now that's a good one!People complaining about their conferences delaying their fall sports should be applauding that the conferences put their respective communities, athletes and their family and friends health first instead of the almighty dollar.
this is provided reinfection isn't a thing, which we don't know at this point (we think unlikely, but don't know as there haven't been controlled studies proving cessation of infection then re-exposure for second infection).
It wouldn’t be all that unusual for genetic drift or shift to occur and allow for recurrent infection though (ie the why this could be a recurrent issue). though you are correct i did specifically say reinfectionTrue. There could be unusual immune mechanisms and evasion and immune enhancement issues. But, I have evolved to err on the side of “show me” over the years though. Dwelling on unlikely realities isn’t psychologically healthy and fear-based decisions are generally poor ones although the math sometimes works out in ones favor.
....and Rutgers just announced they have 30 positive tests.
You were in the room???HA!!!! Now that's a good one!
This decision had absolutely ZERO to do with health and safety. This decision was made by a room full of lawyers and insurance folks whose sole purpose was to calculate and assess the level of risk involved from a liability standpoint and what the exposure was at each university.
This one comment perfectly embodies the state of discourse in our country.You are 100% wrong and a douche.
This was written by a physician who is a specialist and has no interest in the current whining and libertarian outrage about the status of the college football season.
Those with no or superficial knowledge of the subject are welcome to respond.
Opinion | Covid-19 Is Creating a Wave of Heart Disease (Published 2020)
Emerging data show that some of the coronavirus’s most potent damage is inflicted on the heart.www.nytimes.com
This was written by a physician who is a specialist and has no interest in the current whining and libertarian outrage about the status of the college football season.
Those with no or superficial knowledge of the subject are welcome to respond.
Opinion | Covid-19 Is Creating a Wave of Heart Disease (Published 2020)
Emerging data show that some of the coronavirus’s most potent damage is inflicted on the heart.www.nytimes.com
Outbreaks everywhere already.