MNGoldenGophers1
Go4 Homer
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2009
- Messages
- 4,765
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
You cheer to influence the games? That's cute.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cute indeed. So why should fans donate money to the program?
You cheer to influence the games? That's cute.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Considering Minnesota is top 5 in Big Ten athletics revenue, there's really no reason to not spend top dollar on a coach.
Cute indeed. So why should fans donate money to the program?
A multitude of reasons, but I'm more interested in why you are changing the subject? I didn't comment on anything you said that had anything to do with donating $ what-so-ever. I commented on your statement implying that fans cheering for the Gophers can influence their results on the field. Sounds kinda silly when someone else says it, huh?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not sure top 5 revenue in B1G is "top dollar" in coaching salary. The top line is pretty steep as far as coaching spending goes.
Just saying the university is more than capable of committing to an upper-tier staff. Some schools put money into football, some don't.
![]()
![]()
You are a silly guy to be sure. <b>The original post I responded to suggested that fans expectations had zero influence on the program. </b>I don't see donations and fan expectations as being mutually exclusive but perhaps you can enlighten me as to why not?
Simple - your response to that post saying fan expectations had zero influence was "why do you cheer then"? No talk of donations at all.
Wanting the gophers to win, expecting the gophers to win, cheering for the gophers to win, and the like have no impact on the results. Maybe if I would have went to Happy Valley and yelled we would have won?
Now you are going to change this into a donating $ conversation which is totally different. What next, you gonna say coaches and players matter? Duh. This whole "fans accept mediocrity is the problem" discussion may be the dumbest thing ever posted on GH and that is saying a lot. How you or I react to a win/loss or how/where/why or if we cheer for them has zero, zip, zilch influence on results. We discuss it here - which is fun - but it changes nothing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A multitude of reasons, but I'm more interested in why you are changing the subject? I didn't comment on anything you said that had anything to do with donating $ what-so-ever. I commented on your statement implying that fans cheering for the Gophers can influence their results on the field. Sounds kinda silly when someone else says it, huh?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure why I am inserting myself in this argument, and I might be missing something cuz I didn't read the previous pages, but are you telling me that having a large, rowdy crowd can't have an effect on the outcome? Isn't it possible that a hundred thousand screaming fans might have had an impact on the PSU victory over OSU? Maybe I'm missing something.
Yeah, I see your point. I was saying whether I cheer or not or how I cheer has no effect. Now a whole stadium of 100K obviously can have an impact. My main callout here is this stupid "don't accept mediocrity" campaign - but I do see your point and MNGOPH1 dude has explained his point.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Your cheers count, Starting a national get out the cheer campaign. This is how we will "Make the Gophers Great Again"
A multitude of reasons, but I'm more interested in why you are changing the subject? I didn't comment on anything you said that had anything to do with donating $ what-so-ever. I commented on your statement implying that fans cheering for the Gophers can influence their results on the field. Sounds kinda silly when someone else says it, huh?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Doesn't home team crowd noise make any difference?
We don't have the booster support system here to spend big time dollars on a coaching staff. LSU didn't pony up the money for Aranda the boosters did.