A_Slab_of_Bacon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2015
- Messages
- 24,323
- Reaction score
- 14,725
- Points
- 113
BAHAHAHA!!! How can this guy keep getting major college jobs?? Getting rid of him was the turning point of the Gophers success!!RIP Rutgers.
Until it's not.Failure is growth.
If there is one thing Robb Smith is going to do for Rutgers, it's going to give them stability that's for sure!!I see this as a strong move by Rutgers to preserve their identity.
Congrats to them as they seek some stability among all the changes that are being undertaken with their program.
But has he really?BAHAHAHA!!! How can this guy keep getting major college jobs?? Getting rid of him was the turning point of the Gophers success!!
But has he really?
I don't get what you are saying. I would consider Arkansas, Minnesota and Rutgers, all D-1 schools major college jobs. He is making at least a half mill a year for garbage!!But has he really?
I don't get what you are saying. I would consider Arkansas, Minnesota and Rutgers, all D-1 schools major college jobs. He is making at least a half mill a year for garbage!!
That guy must interview well.
He has grown by leaps and bounds.Maybe he does a better job and learns from his failures.
Failure is growth.
The biggest indictment of Smith was that as soon as he was fired the defense got immediately better. How any team can hire him as the DC after what happened here is beyond me.
Coaching positions are flukey and a guy who is an idiot one day can be a genius the next with the right players but it is still surprising to see him get another DC job given how things ended here.
Sounds like Minnesota school Superintendents.This, paired with a historically poor offense will certainly do the trick.
Once a guy is in the circle, he’s in. Failed experience is better than no experience. There’s gotta be hundreds of position coaches rolling their eyes across America at this one.
I'm sure in one week he didn't install an entirely new defense, but if you even just look at where players were positioned that next game it was obvious things had changed. I'm assuming those formations (if you call them that) were in the playbook, but not being utilized by Smith? It was a significant change in position on the field and responsibility.With the sudden upswing in defensive performance, it's easy to understand the crowds distaste for Robb Smith. But in reality, it wasn't like Joe Rossi came in an implemented a brand new defensive plan. If I recall correctly, even Fleck said that the plan stayed basically the same, but the emphasis on speed and minimization of decisions was the real change. Perhaps just the communication just wasn't there.
Doesn't make Smith a bad DC. Maybe with a little more time, the frustration would have passed and results would be the same.
To Flecks credit, he recognized the need and made the change. But I find it hard to believe Fleck would have trusted him if he didn't have confidence in his planning.
The biggest indictment of Smith was that as soon as he was fired the defense got immediately better. How any team can hire him as the DC after what happened here is beyond me.
Coaching positions are flukey and a guy who is an idiot one day can be a genius the next with the right players but it is still surprising to see him get another DC job given how things ended here.