Reusse's tweet about Trevor

Yep. Honestly I feel like the only reason the Wolves aren't a shoo-in for the playoffs (even without Rubio) is because of the SG and SF positions. You can have the best PF of all time and this team would still probably struggle to make the playoffs.

The Wolves with Rubio were a borderline playoff team. After he went down,and with the limited minutes Pekovic has been able to play the last 3 weeks,there was no chance for the playoffs. You could replace Love with Larry Bird or Magic in their prime,and they still wouldn't have made the playoffs.
 

zambam said:
I don't think with Dirk the T-Wolves are in the playoffs. What does he add to the team that Love doesn't and does that make up for what Love adds that Dirk doesn't? With any player that isn't a PF and is a top 5 player in the league, the T-Wolves are in the playoffs? Well ya, is that supposed to mean something? Is it Love's fault that management decided to build a team with no SG or SF? There is not a single PF in the NBA that would get the T-Wolves in the playoffs because of the lack of talent at other positions. Your argument is meaningless.

Disagree completely. Dirk would easily get the wolves into the playoffs. He just won a title with Jason Kidd, Jason Terry, and Tyson Chandler. He'd at least make the playoffs with Minnesota. Dirk can create his own shot. He can dominate and take over games and he wins. Dirk is a nearly unguardable player. His fadeaway (none for Love) and shot creation are great. He can handle and drive and has post moves. A couple of rebounds for a team that hasn't won squat and no post game short of getting fouled doesn't make you better than Dirk or Duncan or KG or LeBron or Kobe or Durant. And that is what many Minnesota fans want to do when they claim he is the MVP.

The Kevin Love argument is the same as the Al Jefferson one. Everyone claimed Big Al was the greatest Timberwolf ever as his teams finished near the bottom every year as they will again. Although I do think Love is better than Al.

And yeah, the fact a top 3 player makes the wolves better DOES matter and is the point of the trade claim. This is the deepest and best draft in a long long time, one draft produced Melo, Wade and James. If that were the draft again id beg the wolves to trade Love for a top 3 pick. Whether or not a player of that caliber is in this draft can be debated, but If u felt there was one, you'd be stupid to pass on it. And a guy can't be the MVP if you can say you'd trade him straight up for someone else and you'd be better off.

I like Kevin Love, but he is no where near the MVP or the best player in the NBA. And if you think a guy that could be an MVP or best player in the NBA is in this draft you easily take that trade. Again, not saying that is this draft, but if LBJ out of high school was the number 1 pick again. Knowing nothing of what's happened recently since draft day. I move Love for him in a split second. No question. Love is an all star for sure, he is a good player and will be an excellent part of a 1-2 punch with a scoring 2 guard, but you can't ever convince me he is the MVP or a top 5-10 player in the NBA.
 

bigticket1 said:
The Wolves with Rubio were a borderline playoff team. After he went down,and with the limited minutes Pekovic has been able to play the last 3 weeks,there was no chance for the playoffs. You could replace Love with Larry Bird or Magic in their prime,and they still wouldn't have made the playoffs.

Kobe Bryant made the playoffs and nearly beat the 2 seed with a team who's starting lineup was:

PG: Smush Parker
SG: Kobe Bryant
SF: Lamar Odom
PF: Kwame Brown
C: Chris Mihm

With the key bench players being Brian Cook, Devean George, and Luke Walton.

I'd assume if Kobe can take THAT team to the playoffs, Bird or Magic could get the Wolves there. That Laker team is an ugly ugly roster.
 

Disagree completely. Dirk would easily get the wolves into the playoffs. He just won a title with Jason Kidd, Jason Terry, and Tyson Chandler. He'd at least make the playoffs with Minnesota. Dirk can create his own shot. He can dominate and take over games and he wins.

Kidd, Terry, Chandler, Marion, C. Butler, B. Haywood are all better and MUCH more experienced than the Wolves team.

Dirk is a nearly unguardable player. His fadeaway (none for Love) and shot creation are great. He can handle and drive and has post moves.

They both do different things. Love is better inside than Dirk. Love scores more points per game at an almost equal efficiency.

A couple of rebounds for a team that hasn't won squat and no post game short of getting fouled doesn't make you better than Dirk or Duncan or KG or LeBron or Kobe or Durant.

HE has more than a couple rebounds more than Dirk. He has almost twice as many rebounds per game than Dirk. Love has actually hit a few last second shots and I really hope you're not talking about Duncan and KG right now.

The Kevin Love argument is the same as the Al Jefferson one. Everyone claimed Big Al was the greatest Timberwolf ever as his teams finished near the bottom every year as they will again. Although I do think Love is better than Al.

In all my time following the Wolves, i've never heard a single person think Al was the greatest Timberwolf ever. I've never even heard anyone joke about it. This thread, is the first time that I've ever heard any such thing. Oh, and comparing Love to Al is laughable. It's not even close.

but you can't ever convince me he is the MVP or a top 5-10 player in the NBA.

Name 10 players better than him...
 

I think you misunderstand what the MVP award is all about.
 


Kobe Bryant made the playoffs and nearly beat the 2 seed with a team who's starting lineup was:

PG: Smush Parker
SG: Kobe Bryant
SF: Lamar Odom
PF: Kwame Brown
C: Chris Mihm

With the key bench players being Brian Cook, Devean George, and Luke Walton.

I'd assume if Kobe can take THAT team to the playoffs, Bird or Magic could get the Wolves there. That Laker team is an ugly ugly roster.

Yep, that's an ugly Lakers team. However, Kobe is one of the greatest players of all time. If you look at that roster, it isn't much worse than the Wolves roster. Rubio only played for 1/2 the season and while he played, we were right there for the playoffs, and this Laker team was a #7 seed.
 

Disagree completely.

The Kevin Love argument is the same as the Al Jefferson one. Everyone claimed Big Al was the greatest Timberwolf ever as his teams finished near the bottom every year as they will again. Although I do think Love is better than Al.

I completely disagree with your disagreeing. Love is a difference maker on any team.

No one ever said Al Jefferson was the greatest T-Wolf ever-no one.

Trading Love would be a "getting fired" move right now. I guess I don't understand your stance on him at all?

The only thing he needs to improve on is his defense and there aren't too many players you can't say that about as well.
 

Bob_Loblaw said:
Name 10 players better than him...

Kobe bryant
Dewayne Wade
Lebron James
Kevin Durant
Derrick Rose
Dwight Howard
Carmelo Anthony
Chris Paul
Dirk Nowitzki
Steve Nash

There are 10 clear cut better than Love (IMO). Would I trade Love for some of them? Yeah. But Love is young (although older than trevor Mbakwe lol) so he does still have great upside. I would not give up Love for Nash for example. No way.

Around the same level (could be slightly better or worse) as Love could add:

Paul Pierce
Pau Gasol
Rajon Rondo
Tony Parker
Brandon Jennings
Chris Bosh
Andrew Bynum
LaMarcus Aldridge
Kyrie Irving
Russell Westbrook
 

zambam said:
I think you misunderstand what the MVP award is all about.

IMO it is the best player on one of the best teams. Stats never tell the whole story. Guys can put up great numbers on a crap team by default, still good players, but not as good as their numbers suggest. IMO that is love. He is a good player and is a good #2 guy a la Pau Gasol in LA, but he won't carry a team like KG could. And I HATE KG.
 



Kobe bryant
Dewayne Wade
Lebron James
Kevin Durant
Derrick Rose
Dwight Howard
Carmelo Anthony
Chris Paul
Dirk Nowitzki
Steve Nash

There are 10 clear cut better than Love (IMO). Would I trade Love for some of them? Yeah. But Love is young (although older than trevor Mbakwe lol) so he does still have great upside. I would not give up Love for Nash for example. No way.

Around the same level (could be slightly better or worse) as Love could add:

Paul Pierce
Pau Gasol
Rajon Rondo
Tony Parker
Brandon Jennings
Chris Bosh
Andrew Bynum
LaMarcus Aldridge
Kyrie Irving
Russell Westbrook

Your list gets absolutely bizarre after Dwight Howard.

Carmelo Anthony? There isn't a person on this planet who follows basketball who thinks Anthony is better than Love.
Love scores more, way more efficiently, shoots better from the field and 3, and gets to the free throw line more. Kevin Love is so much better than Carmelo Anthony it makes me wonder how much of the NBA you watch.

Dirk...we've beaten this to death. But at this point in their respective careers, KLove literally does everything better or just as good as Dirk. It's not even close.

Paul and Nash...completely different players, it's impossible to really compare the two.

Your second list is borderline weird...

Brandon Jennings? Seriously?
Chris Bosh?
Kyrie Irving?

I think you could go to each of their team's message boards and ask them who they would rather have, Love or any player on that list (besides maybe Westbrook), and they would pick Love without hesitation.
 

tikited said:
I completely disagree with your disagreeing. Love is a difference maker on any team.

No one ever said Al Jefferson was the greatest T-Wolf ever-no one.

Trading Love would be a "getting fired" move right now. I guess I don't understand your stance on him at all?

The only thing he needs to improve on is his defense and there aren't too many players you can't say that about as well.

You're right. No one said That about Al. Just exaggerating after all of the all star Screaming for him.

I agree, you don't trade Love unless you are darn sure u r getting a current or future top 10 guy. And if you eff it up. You're gone. Plus Love is still young so he can definitely continue to improve his game and get even better.
 

This is all completely off the point of the original post, but I had to chime in here. Scher215, I like you and your relentless optimism re: the Gophers, but your Kevin Love take is, to put it bluntly, terrible, and is way off base. Did you know that, in the month of March, Kevin Love became the first player in the history of the NBA to lead the league in points, rebounds, and made 3-pointers in the course of a single month? First player, ever, in the entire history of the league. And the NBA has been around a while. The point of bringing this up is that Love has a unique skill set that is rarely seen in the NBA. Bill Simmons, a very knowledgeable NBA writer and unabashed Celtics homer, considers Larry Bird nearly a deity. He has been talking about Love a lot lately and saying he's seeing Love do things that he hasn't seen a player do since Bird was in his prime. He's not saying that Love is as good as Bird was, but even bringing them up in the same sentence is unbelievably high praise coming from the biggest Celtics/Bird ball-washer on the planet.

As others have said, he possesses every single NBA skill at at least a "good" level with the exception of on-ball defense. He and Al Jefferson are not even remotely comparable. As Bob said, no one has ever called Al Jefferson the greatest T-wolf ever, nor anything close to it, so that straw man has no place in this argument. Kevin Love is a much, much better player than Al Jefferson ever dreamt of being. There is also no one in this draft who will come close to "Top 3 player in the NBA" status, and almost certainly no one who will be as good as Love is right now. Keep in mind that Love is only 23 years old. Trading him for any pick in this draft, even the #1 overall, is a colossally stupid idea and would demand that the perpetrator (Kahn, presumably) be immediately fired.
 

I'd take that trade in a heartbeat. IMO (and I realize this puts me in the minority) Kevin Love is the most overrated player in the NBA right now. He is a good player and a player you need on your team, he helps your team, and is a necessary piece to win, but no team with Love as its best player will ever compete for a championship.

If you swapped Love for Kobe, Wade, Durant, LBJ, Dirk, etc. the currently constructed wolves would immediately make the playoffs and yet people want to give Love MVP because he puts up inflated numbers on a bad team. If you think there is a talent at the level of LBJ, Wade, Kobe, etc. in the top 3 you make that deal without thinking twice.

You're right. I have no doubt if the Wolves traded Love for those guys they would be immediately better. Problem is I dont think they can all fit under the salary cap.
 



You're right. No one said That about Al. Just exaggerating after all of the all star Screaming for him.

I agree, you don't trade Love unless you are darn sure u r getting a current or future top 10 guy. And if you eff it up. You're gone. Plus Love is still young so he can definitely continue to improve his game and get even better.

Why trade a 23 year old who is already a top 10 player in the NBA for a draft pick who MIGHT turn out to be top 10 someday, but more than likely will not?
 

Kobe bryant
Dewayne Wade
Lebron James
Kevin Durant
Derrick Rose
Dwight Howard
Carmelo Anthony
Chris Paul
Dirk Nowitzki
Steve Nash

There are 10 clear cut better than Love (IMO). Would I trade Love for some of them? Yeah. But Love is young (although older than trevor Mbakwe lol) so he does still have great upside. I would not give up Love for Nash for example. No way.

Around the same level (could be slightly better or worse) as Love could add:

Paul Pierce
Pau Gasol
Rajon Rondo
Tony Parker
Brandon Jennings
Chris Bosh
Andrew Bynum
LaMarcus Aldridge
Kyrie Irving
Russell Westbrook

No offense, but you are insane. Had to edit this a bit, so you don't take this as an insult-just another fan disagreeing with you.
 

The only explanation I can think of as to why you feel this way is that you have watched zero or little T-wolves action in 2011-12. You seem to be basing your opinions on 2010-11 Kevin Love. The difference between 2010-11 Kevin Love and 2011-12 Kevin Love is night and day. The Kevin Love of 2010-11 was a borderline All-Star and a guy who would be a good complementary 3rd player on a championship team. The 2011-12 Kevin Love is a legitimate franchise player and a probable First Team All-NBA selection. Among players in the league who are 25 or younger, who would you rather have? Maybe Kevin Durant and Derrick Rose? Who else? Maybe Westbrook if you have several good posts and are devoid of a PG?

I'm just trying to wrap my head around this bafflingly bad take, coming from a very good poster nonetheless.
 

dpodoll68 said:
This is all completely off the point of the original post, but I had to chime in here. Scher215, I like you and your relentless optimism re: the Gophers, but your Kevin Love take is, to put it bluntly, terrible, and is way off base. Did you know that, in the month of March, Kevin Love became the first player in the history of the NBA to lead the league in points, rebounds, and made 3-pointers in the course of a single month? First player, ever, in the entire history of the league. And the NBA has been around a while. The point of bringing this up is that Love has a unique skill set that is rarely seen in the NBA. Bill Simmons, a very knowledgeable NBA writer and unabashed Celtics homer, considers Larry Bird nearly a deity. He has been talking about Love a lot lately and saying he's seeing Love do things that he hasn't seen a player do since Bird was in his prime. He's not saying that Love is as good as Bird was, but even bringing them up in the same sentence is unbelievably high praise coming from the biggest Celtics/Bird ball-washer on the planet.

As others have said, he possesses every single NBA skill at at least a "good" level with the exception of on-ball defense. He and Al Jefferson are not even remotely comparable. As Bob said, no one has ever called Al Jefferson the greatest T-wolf ever, nor anything close to it, so that straw man has no place in this argument. Kevin Love is a much, much better player than Al Jefferson ever dreamt of being. There is also no one in this draft who will come close to "Top 3 player in the NBA" status, and almost certainly no one who will be as good as Love is right now. Keep in mind that Love is only 23 years old. Trading him for any pick in this draft, even the #1 overall, is a colossally stupid idea and would demand that the perpetrator (Kahn, presumably) be immediately fired.

Don't get me wrong, I think Love is a VERY good player.

Jeremy Lin however also did something no one in the history of the league had done and I won't crown him top 5 just yet either, yet many including Simmons, hopped right onto that bandwagon.

I usually agree with Bill Simmons though (he's easily My favorite writer even with all the Lakers hate), but I just don't here. I realize I am in the minority, I accept it. I think Love for OJ Mayo was absolutely the right call (I didn't at the time, but Love has changed my mind).

I just don't see what Love does that a guy like Pao Gasol or Chris Bosh doesn't? He can shoot threes which gives him an edge, but throw Dirk in there and he is an excellent 3 point shooter. (I do think Love is better than Pau or Bosh though) but I don't want to anoint him as the greatest player just yet. I hate KG, but he did things on the court Love just can't at this point. KG had an excellent post game and a killer fade away and could create his shot almost like a guard. He also had a great defensive game.

I don't think you can take a guy like Love, who again, is a good player in his own right, and make him the MVP, best player in the NBA when his game isn't fully complete and he doesn't have one great great skill and he hasn't taken a team to the playoffs yet. I can't imagine a scenario where the MVP doesn't even make the playoffs. He does rebound well, but who is he competing for rebounds with? Darko?

And as far as this years draft, I agree, I doubt there is top 3 talent here, but say a guy like Shabazz Muhammed comes out next year and is said to be better than LBJ, and it were pretty common knowledge that that were true, I'd pull the trigger there. Granted that's rare, and I think ole Pat's point was "I've heard this is a deep draft, and i do need to piss some people off, so let's do it now!!!!" but I don't think Davis or Sullinger will be as good as Love is right now or going forward.

If you swap KG prime with Love right now I think that team wins more games and knowing that I just can't make Love king right now (not that it is my decision or anything though). other players have won more games with the same or worst supporting casts, to me that makes them a better player.

I love Kevin Love and I love the Wolves. But I think Rubio is more important to that team with his ability to make below average guys look good, than Love is and that Love isn't at KG (prime) or many current players level yet and people want to make him the MVP and the best player in the NBA. I just don't buy that he is. And
Maybe my definition of an MVP or a franchise player is different than many others, which is fine, but I just don't see him there yet.
 

Don't backtrack too much, Scher. After Tap pointed out Reusse's suggestion that we trade Love for a top 3 lottery pick THIS year, you said:

I'd take that trade in a heartbeat.

To address some of the other issues raised:

Implying that Kobe wins with less talent around him is simply irrelevant. I don't really like the guy, but Kobe is at least a top-10 player, all-time, maybe even top-5.

Implying that Dirk does more as a power forward is also irrelevant. Dirk has had considerably more offensive firepower around him his entire career, even on last year's championship team of grey beards. Even Hall of Famer KG couldn't get past the first round of the playoffs without hired guns Cassell and Sprewell.

The whole book isn't written on Love yet, obviously. But to suggest that a team should unload a 23-year-old with his numbers is absolutely ludicrous. The Wolves backcourt, with Rubio, was tenuous at best. Without Rubio, it's feeble. The Wolves are a couple of pieces from being really good. Best case scenario is Rubio improves in all phases and the team finds real help at SG/SF.
 

andy said:
Don't backtrack too much, Scher. After Tap pointed out Reusse's suggestion that we trade Love for a top 3 lottery pick THIS year, you said:

To address some of the other issues raised:

Implying that Kobe wins with less talent around him is simply irrelevant. I don't really like the guy, but Kobe is at least a top-10 player, all-time, maybe even top-5.

Implying that Dirk does more as a power forward is also irrelevant. Dirk has had considerably more offensive firepower around him his entire career, even on last year's championship team of grey beards. Even Hall of Famer KG couldn't get past the first round of the playoffs without hired guns Cassell and Sprewell.

The whole book isn't written on Love yet, obviously. But to suggest that a team should unload a 23-year-old with his numbers is absolutely ludicrous. The Wolves backcourt, with Rubio, was tenuous at best. Without Rubio, it's feeble. The Wolves are a couple of pieces from being really good. Best case scenario is Rubio improves in all phases and the team finds real help at SG/SF.

I don't disagree. But you're right, I jumped too quickly at what ole pat said. I was more agreeing with the premise that if there is a top 5 NBA player available via the draft (sounds dumb I know) you take them for a guy who isn't a top 5 NBA player. I apologize if it came across as back tracking, but you're right, I should have known better to immediately agree with Pat (a life lesson really)

I agree Love has plenty of room to improve as well and I like him a lot as a player. But they do need that SG. And yes KG needed Sam and Spre, but they weren't exactly superstars. I think right now Love would need more than that. (both deserve(d) more than that though too) I hope Love can continue to improve and be as dominant as KG was, I just don't think he is there yet and that regardless of his numbers, the MVP talk is a little premature. Some even have Love as the #2 candidate behind LBJ or Durant. I just don't see that.
 

And yes KG needed Sam and Spre, but they weren't exactly superstars.

Neither was a superstar, true, but both were very good players. Both were on the backside of their careers (ages 34 and 33, respectively), but Spre was a 4-time All-Star and once made All-NBA First Team, while Cassell made the All-Star Team and was 2nd-Team All-NBA during that 2004 season. Who on this team, outside of Rubio and Love, has even a remote shot of ever making an All-Star or All-NBA team, let alone doing it 4 times? The fact is that the 2004 team was easily the best in T-wolves history, and the current roster is at least (at least) one legitimate All-Star player away from matching the caliber of that team. That team had 4 current or former All-Stars (the aforementioned 3 plus Szczerbiak), and the current roster has one. It's not fair to hold that team against Love. KG in his prime was no doubt better than Love is now, but Love still has a good 4-5 years left before he hits his prime. Let's revisit the comparison then.
 

Kobe Bryant made the playoffs and nearly beat the 2 seed with a team who's starting lineup was:

PG: Smush Parker
SG: Kobe Bryant
SF: Lamar Odom
PF: Kwame Brown
C: Chris Mihm

With the key bench players being Brian Cook, Devean George, and Luke Walton.

I'd assume if Kobe can take THAT team to the playoffs, Bird or Magic could get the Wolves there. That Laker team is an ugly ugly roster.

That team finished the regular season with a 42-40 regular season record. Two games over .500 won't get you into the playoffs in the West anymore (8 seed was 46-36 last year, 50-32 in '10, 48-34 in '09, 50-32 in '08, whereas in '07 and the years prior, a few games over .500 was good enough in the West). If you put that Lakers team in the West this year, I think they'd be right around where the Rubio-less Wolves are.

I think everybody else has done a pretty thorough job of debunking the rest of your points, but I thought I'd mention that.
 


dpodoll68 said:
Neither was a superstar, true, but both were very good players. Both were on the backside of their careers (ages 34 and 33, respectively), but Spre was a 4-time All-Star and once made All-NBA First Team, while Cassell made the All-Star Team and was 2nd-Team All-NBA during that 2004 season. Who on this team, outside of Rubio and Love, has even a remote shot of ever making an All-Star or All-NBA team, let alone doing it 4 times? The fact is that the 2004 team was easily the best in T-wolves history, and the current roster is at least (at least) one legitimate All-Star player away from matching the caliber of that team. That team had 4 current or former All-Stars (the aforementioned 3 plus Szczerbiak), and the current roster has one. It's not fair to hold that team against Love. KG in his prime was no doubt better than Love is now, but Love still has a good 4-5 years left before he hits his prime. Let's revisit the comparison then.

I completely agree. 110%.

My point is also, look at the team LBJ took to the finals? Did anyone on that team ever even sniff an all star game? (I honestly don't remember) but it was not a very good team. Or the team AI took to the finals. Elite, MVP type players dominate and take over games, make players around them, who have no business putting up good numbers or winning, much better. And they win. It is a team sport, but in basketball, one guy can somewhat carry a team if needed and I want to see a guy win before making him the MVP.

Love is not as good as KG in his prime and he only won a single MVP award, love isn't as talented and yet we want to give him one right now? No way.

Last night watching Celtics / Heat, KG with awful knees, dominated the 4th quarter. Hitting every shot he took, fall always, pull ups, and even playing PG for stretches. The Heat had to put Bron on him, arguably the best defender in the NBA, to contain him. He played with more intensity than any other player on the court and is just a presence. Now, he doesn't do that on a nightly basis as he is old old old, but I have never seen Love be that much of a force (I realize it also helps Kevin to have Ray, PP and rondo)

I agree though, he is the best PF in the NBA (could make a case for Dirk though too). he has age (upside,) a jump shot, rebounding, etc. but I don't think that makes him the MVP / best player in the NBA right now. He could get there, absolutely, but the original premise of trading him, if a guy like Wade, James, Kobe, etc. came out in a draft it may be worth it to make that deal. As I also said, those players are somewhat rare (obviously) and they may not be in this draft, but say Anthony Davis wins the MVP next year as a rookie (never going to happen) and takes the bobcats to the conference finals as a rookie, in hindsight, would that have been a good trade to
Make? Absolutely. If a special type player comes out and you can get a team to take Love for them, do it. My personal preference? Jazz make the playoffs so the Wolves get their pick, we absolutely keep Love, and draft a scoring guard (rivers maybe?) and let that core (Rubio, rivers, and Love) develop and win!
 

SonOfTheVarsity said:
That team finished the regular season with a 42-40 regular season record. Two games over .500 won't get you into the playoffs in the West anymore (8 seed was 46-36 last year, 50-32 in '10, 48-34 in '09, 50-32 in '08, whereas in '07 and the years prior, a few games over .500 was good enough in the West). If you put that Lakers team in the West this year, I think they'd be right around where the Rubio-less Wolves are.

I think everybody else has done a pretty thorough job of debunking the rest of your points, but I thought I'd mention that.

2001 Sixers:

PG: Eric Snow
SG: Allen Iverson
SF: Tyrone Hill
PF: George Lynch
C: Theo Ratliff

2007 Cavs:

PG: Eric Snow
SG: Larry Hughes
SF: LeBron James
PF: Drew Gooden
C: Zydrunas Ilgauskas

Both teams made the finals with ugly rosters. just saying, Love is not in the company of LBJ, or old AI, in leading teams to wins, and IMO, MVP candidacy. (or it shows that Eric Snow is the perfect PG for a finals team)
 

Neither was a superstar, true, but both were very good players. Both were on the backside of their careers (ages 34 and 33, respectively), but Spre was a 4-time All-Star and once made All-NBA First Team, while Cassell made the All-Star Team and was 2nd-Team All-NBA during that 2004 season. Who on this team, outside of Rubio and Love, has even a remote shot of ever making an All-Star or All-NBA team, let alone doing it 4 times? The fact is that the 2004 team was easily the best in T-wolves history, and the current roster is at least (at least) one legitimate All-Star player away from matching the caliber of that team. That team had 4 current or former All-Stars (the aforementioned 3 plus Szczerbiak), and the current roster has one. It's not fair to hold that team against Love. KG in his prime was no doubt better than Love is now, but Love still has a good 4-5 years left before he hits his prime. Let's revisit the comparison then.

If Derrick Williams can put it all together I do think he can be a multi time All-Star. Honestly, B-easy has potential to be one also, but I don't think he will ever get to that level because he such a black hole and takes too many bad shots. We have seen him explode some nights out of no where and have seen how great he can be though. My last guy is Pek. If he can have a completely healthy season and play like he did when Rubio is healthy then they have a pretty solid lineup. Everyone after that is garbage.

PG: Rubio SG: Anyone but Wes SF: Beasley PF: Love C: Pek
That is a solid lineup with D-Will as the 6th man. Im not discouraged even alittle bit right now with the losing. All of our best have been in and out of the lineup. Idk if Beasley will come back next year so idk if that lineup is possible. I did like Beasley off the bench better than starting, but I am not a fan of Webster so that is by default.
 

BTW in no means by my previous statement do I think those three guys will 100% be allstars I am just saying give it a few years and we will see. They are all pretty young. All that being said I wonder which team gets more wins? A timerwolves team w/ Ricky healthy and Love injured, or our current situation with Ricky out and Love healthy? Hmmmm?
 

2001 Sixers:

PG: Eric Snow
SG: Allen Iverson
SF: Tyrone Hill
PF: George Lynch
C: Theo Ratliff

2007 Cavs:

PG: Eric Snow
SG: Larry Hughes
SF: LeBron James
PF: Drew Gooden
C: Zydrunas Ilgauskas

Both teams made the finals with ugly rosters. just saying, Love is not in the company of LBJ, or old AI, in leading teams to wins, and IMO, MVP candidacy. (or it shows that Eric Snow is the perfect PG for a finals team)

The 2001 Sixers had Dikembe Mutombo (8-time All-Star (including 2001) and 4-time Defensive Player of the Year (including 2001)). Mutombo played 42 mpg in the playoffs and had 13.9 ppg, 13.7 rpg, and 3.1 bpg in the playoffs. Ratliff also made his only All-Star appearance that year and was later traded for Mutombo. So, basically, they took a very good center and traded him for an even better one, one who would win his 4th DPOY that season. McKie and Snow were also solid rotation players for them. I'd take either over any of our backcourt players not named Rubio.

The 2007 Cavs had 2-time All-Star Ilgauskas, and two very solid rotation players in Larry Hughes and Drew Gooden. Again, I would take either of them over any of our players not named Love or Rubio.

Either squad was much better than our current T-wolves, especially defensively. The 2001 Sixers were 5th in both Opp PPG and Def Rtg, while the 2007 Cavs were 5th and 4th. The 2012 Timberwolves are 24th and 21st in these two categories. Where you will see the T-wolves going from a late lottery team to a playoff team is through defensive improvements. Love has already gotten much better this season defensively after stagnating in that area through his first 3, and it is likely he will continue to get better (along with Rubio and Williams) given his young age.
 

It seems to me that scher's argument is that Love isn't one of the top players in NBA history yet. Seriously, the comparisons are to teams led by Allen Iverson, Lebron James, and Kobe Bryant.
 

Every thread about Reusse should turn out like this lol.

Kevin Love is a bonafide top 10 (I'll give you top 15 maybe) player in the NBA. You don't trade him for a top 3 pick in this draft, period. He's even become almost passable on defense. The guy has put in the work, and just keeps getting better and better. Why give that up?

And no, Love is not an all-time great....yet. Give the dude some time, he might actually get there for all we know.
 

Wolves need two things to be a greatly improved squad, and when I say greatly I mean potentially a top 4 team in the west.
1. A shotblocking, defensive minded center.
2. A long 2-3 wing player that can knock down 3s consistently.

Pekovic has been a good surprise but he's not going to strike fear into the hearts of people cutting to the basket.

We need to rid ourselves of Wes Johnson and get someone who can flat out shoot.
 




Top Bottom