I REALLY doubt that Reusse is in touch with how much or little buzz the Gophers have. This is a smack piece, nothing more. If you believe Reusse, the Star Tribune and Pioneer Press have been utterly wasting their time by covering the Gophers at all. The reality seems to be that they simply cover the Gophers more than Reusse would like. 50,000 people at the game isn't exactly nothing. There are 37 radio stations in the state that carry Gophers football vs. 25 for hockey and basketball. Are those stations that carry Gophers football making a mistake? Does anyone have any data on ratings for Gopher football games on BTN?
We've been told that support for Gophers football is "miniscule". The attendance isn't at the top of the Big Ten, but it isn't miniscule. 50,000 isn't small, it's just that the Big Ten has some of the largest stadiums not just in the country, but on the planet. And if support is miniscule, then those 37 radio stations are making a mistake. But we are told that it is miniscule compared to hockey, which just isn't true: more people attend Gopher football than attend Gophers hockey.
There is more of a buzz for Gophers football than Reusse would like to admit. That doesn't mean there is a huge buzz, but any buzz at all seems to offend Reusse. I know some people will say "Ignore him and he'll go away." It doesn't work that way, that only works if our criticism of him represented the majority of his media coverage. He's right there on the front of the sports section, whether or not we criticize him. And I know someone will say "we don't want the media to be cheerleaders", but no one is asking the media to cheerlead. We're just asking the media not to be PantherHawk, which Reusse may as well be.