NoelarBear
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2019
- Messages
- 528
- Reaction score
- 1,527
- Points
- 93
Big change, but this makes more sense to me than just adding SC. I would expect that there will be some coordinated scheduling to cut travel costs and travel time in sports like basketball, volleyball, soccer, etc., so that, for example, Minnesota and wisconsin will go out to LA and play each team there in a single weekend and then the Trojans and Bruins will fly to Michigan the next weekend and each play UM and MSU.Is this real? I would assume Oregon wouldn't be far behind if so... Big 12 and Pac 12 are losing credibility fast... This also makes absolutely no sense for those two. Imagine traveling to Maryland or Rutgers for a Tuesday night basketball game.
I'd say ND, Stanford, Oregon and Washington. But I fear Stanford and CAL will be a package deal.So reports are SEC and B10 want to each get to 20. B10 would be at 16 now, ND and Oregon are the easy 2 logical ones. The other 2 are tricky, you assume at this point they want Texas. That leaves TCU and Tex Tech. TCU I think makes more sense in Dal/FtW. Then what, Ok St? Good wrestling, solid in football (T Boone) and basketball. Az St, huge school, has hockey to add a team, AZ great bball program awful football. Or do they punt the southwest and just go for Duke/UNC and build the best bball conf imaginable.
I think they would say hey we got LA and Nike out west, we dont need anymore, thus why I think they go south to either get Texas or down in NC. If they wanted to stay more north i think uVA and Ia St make some sense.I'd say ND, Stanford, Oregon and Washington. But I fear Stanford and CAL will be a package deal.
UVa and Mizzou would be excellent and stealing one from the SEC would be sweet.I think they would say hey we got LA and Nike out west, we dont need anymore, thus why I think they go south to either get Texas or down in NC. If they wanted to stay more north i think uVA and Ia St make some sense.
UA-ASU would bring the #11 market (Phoenix) into the picture plus adding in the Tuscon market, they would be #8.So reports are SEC and B10 want to each get to 20. B10 would be at 16 now, ND and Oregon are the easy 2 logical ones. The other 2 are tricky, you assume at this point they want Texas. That leaves TCU and Tex Tech. TCU I think makes more sense in Dal/FtW. Then what, Ok St? Good wrestling, solid in football (T Boone) and basketball. Az St, huge school, has hockey to add a team, AZ great bball program awful football. Or do they punt the southwest and just go for Duke/UNC and build the best bball conf imaginable.
Plus lots of ex-Minnesotans and road games...UA-ASU would bring the #11 market (Phoenix) into the picture plus adding in the Tuscon market, they would be #8.
Plus they are still growing faster that a lot of the east coast markets.
I think it's more likely we add ice fishing as a sport.i like both campuses. I think each school brings in about $700M each year in donations (about twice what the U brings in). the schools have plenty of money
so, does this mean the U will add a womens beach volleyball team?
I want water polo. We’ve got a nice pool.i like both campuses. I think each school brings in about $700M each year in donations (about twice what the U brings in). the schools have plenty of money
so, does this mean the U will add a womens beach volleyball team?
I'm OK with Cal instead of Oregon. Top school. B1G would own the Bay area market.I'd say ND, Stanford, Oregon and Washington. But I fear Stanford and CAL will be a package deal.
More money but still at the bottom of the league doesn’t advance us much though. Five percent raises are nice but when inflation is ten percent, you’re still losing five.On a positive note. We are in this "super conference " which means we should be in the top tier of money makers. No more having to hire a guy to save money or keep a guy because the buyout is too high. Also more NIL funds