You're changing the argument now. It's not whether or not Kill thought he inherited good talent & depth. That's just a new spin you added on this post. The point is whether the talent/depth was better than what Brew received from Mason?
Mason = Desi Steib, Duran Love, John Shevlin, Mike Sherels, Barret Moen, William Brody, Kevin Mannion, Michael McKelton, Matt Stommes? These were the guys Brew inherited. I didn't cherry-pick the worst players either. These are what Brew was left to work with. There were really only 2-3 legitimate B1G players that were mature & ready to start on the defensive side of the ball. WVS, Dom Barber & arguably Steve Davis. There were also very few younger guys that would ever become decent players. Nate Triplett, Lee Campbell & Garret Brown is about it.
Brew = Gary Tinsley (Jr), Troy Stoudermire (Jr), Kim Royston (Sr), Brandon Kirksey (Jr), Anthony Jacobs (Jr), Jewahn Edwards (Jr), Keenon Cooper (So), Ryan Collado (Sr), Michael Carter (So). That alone is 9 players who were plug 'n' play guys talent-wse. There were also a bunch of quality players coming up the pike in DL Wilhite, Brock Vereen, Mike Rallis, James Manual, Aaron Hill, Rashede Hageman & Cameron Botticelli.
I don't see how you can debate the train wreck that Brew was left with talent-wise? He CLEARLY left Kill more to work with. Understand I'm not saying Brew did a great job. I'm also not saying he left Kill in a perfect situation, but the idea that Brew ruined a good team & Kill started with no talent is simply false.