Poorly-written article on Star Tribune.com

[BigGopherFan]

Lots of blather in the beginning. Everything was just poorly phrased and there was no real insight.

http://www.startribune.com/yourvoic...8cyaiUo8cyaiUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr

 

[dpodoll68]

Everyone who missed the earlier thread (9 replies and counting) will appreciate this.

 

[Doogie]

BigGopherFan - Thanks for taking the time to read. It's a blog, not a full-fledged column, so a different approach is taken. My goal with those is to create a lively discussion. Purposely leave out a few points to not have it read like a book.

 

[diehard]

BigGopherFan, I hate you. I had absolutely no need to click on that link. I should have known how bad it was without looking. There. I'm better now. All's well (except I gave the blog a hit).

 

[sec105]

I must be missing something...

I don't see anything wrong with this "blog". Certainly not enough to actually post a note saying how poorly written it was.

It is no worse or better than 99% of we find on every sports page around the country.


Could it be you simply don't like Doogie?

 

[BigGopherFan]

Who is Doogie?

 

[scalgopher]

A dunce

 

[Unregistered User]

Who is Doogie?

Uhm...You were the original poster, and you obviously read the article.

I think the more relevant question is: Who are you, and why should I care about your opinion?

 

[Section2]

nm