I'm writing this because its therapeutic and I live in Sconny-ville
Here's the crux of the issue.
Tubby was fired too early from a historical sense of when is the right time to fire someone. Generally speaking, you let someone run their play and don't meddle and hope that the guy that was put into the spot to do the job can do the job. If/when he fails then you pull the trigger. Teague did not hire Tubby, he apparently didn't like where Tubby was going or how he was handling the job so he decided to part ways with Tubby early. We can all argue for days and we've actually done it for 3 years, about whether or not that was the right decision. Personally, it's pointless because it already happened. But it's good to understand that Tubby was fired earlier than you generally would, it's weird to fire a coach who just got a team to the tournament especially when it's not a team that typically makes it to the tournament. You shouldn't forget that it happened, but you should stop trying to determine whether or not it should have happened.
This is why the board/media/fanbase is divided and why this is such an interesting case and it makes putting the state the program is in today so complicated and difficult to digest. Had Norwood gone the conventional way and let Tubby coach this team in 2013-14 and 2014-15 and assume that Tubby got the exact same results, he would likely have been fired after last year. Let us assume Pitino came in and got his new recruits and got the exact same results. The fanbase would be optimistic about the future of Pitino ball and likely be excited about the direction of the program.
So that puts us in the interesting spot of determining how good Pitino is, and what his record is. People that are steadfast against him like to attribute those first two years as a regression, or situations where he did worse than the prior year. A typical brand new coach would be applauded for winning the NIT in year one, not Pitino because he's coaching a tournament team from the prior year. And not just a tournament team, but one that won a game in the tournament. Add that mindset to this terrible season and you've got a strong case for firing and a strong case for this guy sucks. 3 straight years of losses, and one year that is the worst in the history of the program. In a vacuum, totally convinced me, I'm on board, fire this guy.
He doesn't get credit for winning the NIT because those weren't his guys, and even if they were his guys they did worse than the guy before him did with them. 99% of 1st-year coaches that win the NIT are looked at very favorably. That said, 99% of the coaches that lose all of their conference games are looked at very negatively.
It's a convoluted situation, how do you rate Pitino, and what were those 2 years after Tubby really about? What really happened there? Tough to say, and for that reason, I think it we should shut the board down until we see what Pitino recruits for 2017 and how this team performs in the nonconference schedule next year before we pass any absolute judgment. Pitino is having a bad year, but he hasn't been a failure, that's horse****. This team is terrible, but is the program really the worst in history? That's not true unless you look solely at the box score of one season.
Why did I write this? I'm as frustrated as you guys are and I'm sick of dealing with employee reviews... Somone should fire me early.