nitramnaed
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2012
- Messages
- 2,370
- Reaction score
- 1,696
- Points
- 113
Nuts JacksonNuts?
Nuts JacksonNuts?
That has been the rule since like 1881Stupid. If they offset it should just be the result of the play
Wow. And to think, it was reviewed and everything. Maybe "forcible" is too subjective for some. He had no place else for his face to go. Jesus.It’s absolute textbook targeting
ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting. When in question, it is a foul. ...
You don’t have to lead with the crown to get the flag
Only way it isn’t targeting is if they were saying he wasn’t defenseless
It’s absolute textbook targeting
ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting. When in question, it is a foul. ...
You don’t have to lead with the crown to get the flag
Only way it isn’t targeting is if they were saying he wasn’t defenseless
So?That has been the rule since like 1881