Official 2026 Roster Movement Thread - Who's In and Who's Out?

Donate To GopherHole
MonikerSchmoniker45 said:
Who? Grant Washington looked pretty good when he got his opportunity.
Click to expand...
Will be interesting to watch how PJ uses Washington next season. Injuries could open the door for Washington to really shine. I like what I've seen of him and he will be a red-shirt freshman in 26.
 

goldfan24 said:
Will be interesting to watch how PJ uses Washington next season. Injuries could open the door for Washington to really shine. I like what I've seen of him and he will be a red-shirt freshman in 26.
Click to expand...
If he doesn't show up better than Estrada in camp it'll push him to 4 on the depth chart probably which could lead him to the portal. Or I suppose Taylor could leave or Tyler could underperform but if not it'll be him or Estrada at 4 and I could see either being unhappy with that proposition.
 





Lots of teams are signing a bunch of high school recruits, but why?
  • Option 1: Recruit a bunch of high school players and hope they stay. Per the rumor mill, we pay them $75K to sign. By far, most of them don't see the field in any meaningful way their first two years, and once they do become meaningful players (meaning they get playing time and show they can contribute), they can enter the portal and leave.
  • Option 2: Recruit only a few high school players (e.g., the top players in the state) and instead focus your NIL money on portal players. Pick players from the portal that fill positions you need.
For Option 1, we're basically the farm club for other teams, where we spend time and money getting the player up to speed, and then they leave (e.g., Jason). Am I missing something, such as does the $75K for new recruits come from a different bucket of money than the NIL for portal players?
 

Full Speed Ahead said:
Lots of teams are signing a bunch of high school recruits, but why?
  • Option 1: Recruit a bunch of high school players and hope they stay. Per the rumor mill, we pay them $75K to sign. By far, most of them don't see the field in any meaningful way their first two years, and once they do become meaningful players (meaning they get playing time and show they can contribute), they can enter the portal and leave.
  • Option 2: Recruit only a few high school players (e.g., the top players in the state) and instead focus your NIL money on portal players. Pick players from the portal that fill positions you need.
For Option 1, we're basically the farm club for other teams, where we spend time and money getting the player up to speed, and then they leave (e.g., Jason). Am I missing something, such as does the $75K for new recruits come from a different bucket of money than the NIL for portal players?
Click to expand...
I thought I saw the 75K comes from our revenue sharing allotment. Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, I'm sure of it.
 

$75,000 is rev share and not NIL. NIL is outside money on top of rev share. I still think you have a better shot at developing players from HS and getting them to stay rather than trying to compete in the open market for transfers.

We get 105 spots and your need about 60-70 each year to be able to field a roster for the whole season. You can afford to take 30 HS kids every year. That gives you a year to evaluate and get them into your depth chart, and have difficult conversations.

How many prime starters have left MN for better programs or have done better at their next stop.

Bucky Irving
Daniels
 

MaxyJR1 said:
$75,000 is rev share and not NIL. NIL is outside money on top of rev share. I still think you have a better shot at developing players from HS and getting them to stay rather than trying to compete in the open market for transfers.

We get 105 spots and your need about 60-70 each year to be able to field a roster for the whole season. You can afford to take 30 HS kids every year. That gives you a year to evaluate and get them into your depth chart, and have difficult conversations.

How many prime starters have left MN for better programs or have done better at their next stop.

Bucky Irving
Daniels
Click to expand...
🎤 Drop
 




MaxyJR1 said:
Put him on the board!
Click to expand...
Great news.

Also if I'm being honest, I don't believe a word of anything roster wise until they play game 1 and said athlete is on the field. With the money being thrown around nowadays it only takes 1 booster to say I want that guy and they're gone. This isn't a comment on Drake at all, it's on the poor excuse of a system the NCAA has allowed.
 

MaxyJR1 said:
$75,000 is rev share and not NIL. NIL is outside money on top of rev share. I still think you have a better shot at developing players from HS and getting them to stay rather than trying to compete in the open market for transfers.

We get 105 spots and your need about 60-70 each year to be able to field a roster for the whole season. You can afford to take 30 HS kids every year. That gives you a year to evaluate and get them into your depth chart, and have difficult conversations.

How many prime starters have left MN for better programs or have done better at their next stop.

Bucky Irving
Daniels
Click to expand...
Beanie Bishop is one you missed.
I would also add Trey Potts as one that left for a better program, although he did not do better at Penn State.
 





You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom