I think it's incredibly interesting to see the states and regions which we put our recruiting emphasis on, especially as compared to some of our rivals. One very long-term trend which Fleck and staff are at this point continuing is that we pretty much forgo recruiting the state of California altogether, a recruiting philosophy which has always been a bit surprising to me, as there is a mother lode of football talent in the Golden State. We've extended 1 offer to a California kid so far (and that's the only player we've offered west of the Colorado River), meanwhile Nebraska (which has always mined the western United States, Hawaii/American Samoa, and especially California very, very hard) has so far offered 23 Californians and 35 players west of the river. So basically we just write off recruiting about 1/3 of the country while pouring focus into the talent rich beds of Texas, Ohio, Georgia, Florida, Michigan, Missouri, Illinois, and etc.
It's fascinating to me to see these different philosophies regarding recruiting. It's really, really cool.
I'm a lot like you in that I find the geography of recruiting interesting. For the non-helmet schools, they often are relegated to picking specific areas and making hay there. We've seen this within our Big Ten brethren: Nebraska (like you said) is huge in California, Florida, and Texas. Iowa is more just Florida and Texas. They also recruit Illinois and Ohio extremely hard. Wisconsin is just like Iowa except not as much in Texas. You start to see trends develop.
Our last staff hit Texas hard, didn't focus much on California, tried but were inconsistent in Florida (I think that goes more to the many layers of the recruiting game in Florida though) and was huge in the Deep South, specifically Georgia and Alabama. Not saying any of those are right or wrong, just pointing it out. Illinois was a focus as well.
California is interesting because of the talent it produces yet this program as a whole has never recruited it super hard. We had 2 scholarship guys from there during the previous regime I believe? Brew got a couple guys from there as well but I get what you're saying. Never been a major focus. I also don't think we absolutely have to go there. More than anything, it has to do more with our staff probably doesn't have a ton of ties there.
Recruiting far west of here is an interesting question too. To be honest, outside of Cali, there isn't a ton of talent far west of here. I suppose Phoenix, Vegas, Denver, and Seattle are about the only spots I'd argue have talent but there's not absolute quantity.
I think this staff has made it clear: Texas is going to be a priority as is some areas in the south (lots out in Georgia already and I expect more, specifically with DB's and Linquist's ties there). Otherwise, this is going to be all about getting every player we can from Big Ten/rust belt. St. Louis, Chicago, Detroit, Indianapolis, Cleveland, and into Jersey are where they are committed to working. I imagine Pittsburgh will pop up as more of a priority too eventually just because it is in the middle of that region we're targeting and our DC is from that area I believe. Once again, not saying it's right, not saying it's wrong, that's just what their focus appears to be.