Stewart Mandel a Northwestern Grad and the College Football guy at The Athletic answered a question about the new stadium.
"Try as it might, the school has never been able to turn Northwestern into “Chicago’s Big Ten team.” There have been exceptions, as I witnessed first hand during the 1995 and ’96 Big Ten championship runs. Old Dyche Stadium was sold out and rocking with purple-clad folks. But over the last decade, even as the program became a consistent bowl team, 30-40,000 was roughly the norm, save for when Ohio State or Michigan came to town and bought up half the stadium.
With that in mind, Northwestern really does not need to be playing in a 50,000-seat stadium. The hope at 35,000 is you’ll have regular sellouts during conference play, and even more importantly, that most of those 35,000 will be wearing purple. And having a more modern, more accessible stadium full of amenities could help entice more casual fans in Chicagoland to come out to some games. You have to do that these days to convince people to leave the comfort of their couch and their 60-inch televisions.
I should also add: Downsizing is not a new phenomenon. In 2006, Stanford tore down its old 90,000-seat bowl that once hosted a Super Bowl and built a more modern, compact structure that’s capped at 50,000. In 2012,
TCU unveiled its beautiful, Camden Yards version of Amon G. Carter Stadium that dropped capacity from about 50,000 to 45,000. A couple of years later, Baylor moved out of outdated Floyd Casey Stadium (50,000) and into sparkling new McLane Stadium (45,000).
If I were building a stadium from scratch today, even at an Alabama or Ohio State, I would plan for smaller, not bigger crowds. In-stadium attendance across college football has been in decline for 15 years. And soon we’ll just be avatars watching games in the metaverse."
Which Big Ten opening is the better gig? What's going on in the state of Colorado?
theathletic.com