I'm excited for the mid-game transfer. Go full WWE.It will be a matter of time before a player will sue (and win) to transfer in the middle of a season and be immediately eligible.
What is the legal basis for preventing a player from playing for two different schools in the same season?? Say transfer between the fall and spring semesters in basketball, over the winter break??Meaning, they didn't have a prayer of winning the lawsuit.
Hit your teammate with a folding chair, and rip off your jersey to show the opposing team's jersey underneath.I'm excited for the mid-game transfer. Go full WWE.
Xerxes beat me to it.It will be a matter of time before a player will sue (and win) to transfer in the middle of a season and be immediately eligible.
I would think that the NCAA could have a rule that you can't play for more than one team in a season. That is different than making people sit out a whole new season.What is the legal basis for preventing a player from playing for two different schools in the same season?? Say transfer between the fall and spring semesters in basketball, over the winter break??
I do t think there is one.
Sue them!!
If it’s an antitrust violation to violate a players NIL rights by making them sit out a season for transferring inbetween seasons …. how is it not exactly the same antitrust violation using exactly the same logic to make them sit out the 2nd half of a season for transferring inbetween halves of a season???I would think that the NCAA could have a rule that you can't play for more than one team in a season. That is different than making people sit out a whole new season.
-Enrollment issues may come in fall or spring sports.Wouldn't enrollment issues from the academic aspect of college prevent someone from playing on two teams in one season? Or am I using too much logic here.
If they are serious about making progress toward a degree, it could make a difference, especially in upper classmen. My guess is they figure out a way to slip around that as well.-Enrollment issues may come in fall or spring sports.
But not in winter sports that cross semesters.
If it’s an antitrust violation to violate a players NIL rights by making them sit out a season for transferring inbetween seasons …. how is it not exactly the same antitrust violation using exactly the same logic to make them sit out the 2nd half of a season for transferring inbetween halves of a season???
Immediate eligibility for transfers has been far and away the worst part of all the insanity in college athletics.
At least when guys had to sit out a year there was an incentive for them to stick it out at the school they committed to.
If I was a helmet school I would barely even bother to recruit high school players anymore.....as long as nobody seems interested in enforcing any sort of tampering rules just go shopping in the off season for a new batch of players.
This and a number of other proposals are all great on paper.I still like my idea....
5 years of college eligibility - no redshirts (unless medically).
- You can transfer at any semester break and gain immediate eligibility.
- Each transfer costs you one year of college eligibility.
- Grad transfers get a free transfer and can retain all 5 years of their initial eligibility
Good point. The school the player is transferring to should reimburse the school the player that is leaving for any previously paid NIL money, and maybe an additional fee?The bottom of FBS and all of FCS will be like what AAA baseball is...farm teams to the Helmet Schools.
The difference is; the Helmet schools pay nothing for developing their talent.
NIL contracts are (outside some specific restrictions) largely open for whatever so ... possible the NIL group could ask for their money back.Good point. The school the player is transferring to should reimburse the school the player that is leaving for any previously paid NIL money, and maybe an additional fee?
Admittedly, I haven't kept up with NIL. Thanks!NIL contracts are (outside some specific restrictions) largely open for whatever so ... possible the NIL group could ask for their money back.
That was implied to have happened already in at least one case.
Some NIL groups would do best to simply pay over time and NOT do a lump sum that they may have to demand back. On the other hand some NIL groups might want to be the asshole... threaten.
100% agree. Give these kids all the money they want, but make sure there are rules in place that force them to actually sit and take some consideration into the actions they're taking if they transfer. It's a fucking circus.Immediate eligibility for transfers has been far and away the worst part of all the insanity in college athletics.
At least when guys had to sit out a year there was an incentive for them to stick it out at the school they committed to.
If I was a helmet school I would barely even bother to recruit high school players anymore.....as long as nobody seems interested in enforcing any sort of tampering rules just go shopping in the off season for a new batch of players.
I believe non-football and basketball sports have always had a one free (no sit out) transfer rule. It was happening in volleyball tooI was shocked when Kendyl Lindaman (former All American Gopher softballer) left Minnesota around Thanksgiving and was playing in a Florida uniform a few short weeks later. This was 2018-2019. At the time, I was glad that football hadn't devolved into that kind of mess. The time is now.
They violate antitrust laws, because they violate NIL rights. Or so say judges, apparently.The NCAA is just the collection of voluntary member institutions that propose and pass rules on how athletic competition will be operated. It's not "the law". Universities don't need to be part of the NCAA and athletes aren't forced to attend an NCAA institution. It makes absolutely no sense to me that courts/judges can dictate how the NCAA operates as long as the rules don't break any state or federal laws.
I believe non-football and basketball sports have always had a one free (no sit out) transfer rule. It was happening in volleyball too