Friend of Tony
New member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2010
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
But we don't want the Scientologists!
cleavon little would so love this thread
cleavon little would so love this thread
Art - "You wanna place the race card eh? How many white starting RB's are there in the B10?"
Let me get this right, you think that White head coaches are discriminating against White running backs in the BT? Wow. You actually magnifiy the relevance of this post in your argument..
The whole "there are more black players, therefore there should be more black coaches" argument is one of the most specious and ridiculous arguments I've ever heard, and yet, people like you continue to advance it.
Think about it like this: it's basically the same as saying, "There are more blacks than whites in prisons across the country, so there should be more black prison wardens." Why have I never heard anyone advance that argument?
This thread is ridiculous. Everyone knows the fraternity of College Football Coaches. I'm all for hiring coaches for the right reasons. It doesnt matter if they're white, black, red, green, or brown! For people to say that race isn't a factor then that's false. No one should be hired just because of their color, but to say that it is only 13 (or however many African american coaches) "Qualified" to be a head coach is sad.
84% of NCAA coaches are tools, but only 25% of people are tools.
We need to fix this. I vote for redistribution of wealth, as this will fix the problem (or at the very least create a new, different problem).
Since our President (of the Union) is of African-American descent, the use of the 'race card' has been tossed the way of the Dodo.
Sorry, weak ass topic subject.