A_Slab_of_Bacon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2015
- Messages
- 24,484
- Reaction score
- 15,004
- Points
- 113
Considering NIL isn't against the rules ... is Matt just advertising that he is getting outbid?
I am with you, no idea what a sub tweet is or what it meansTranslation for a guy who doesn't speak emoji or sub-Tweet?
He is accusing those teams of using money to get players.Translation for a guy who doesn't speak emoji or sub-Tweet?
Good luck with that one. Opened up the twitter replies and even the people in there don't seem to really know exactly what he was going for there. Welcome to the wonderful world of Twitter.Translation for a guy who doesn't speak emoji or sub-Tweet?
And....He is accusing those teams of using money to get players.
Twitter replies are weird. They're often not on topic.Good luck with that one. Opened up the twitter replies and even the people in there don't seem to really know exactly what he was going for there. Welcome to the wonderful world of Twitter.
Duck emoji = Oregon DucksTranslation for a guy who doesn't speak emoji or sub-Tweet?
Do you speak jive?Duck emoji = Oregon Ducks
Money bag emoji = NIL money
Ghost emoji = Players cutting off contact with him, "Ghosting" him.
Hands emjoi = Miami (FL). It's similar to their "U" hand signal
Sub-tweet means to write a tweet about someone but not explicitly mention their name or account handle.
Kinda weird to signal it on signing day IMO.Rhule can also be deflecting lack of recruiting success on NIL....Cornhusker fans are recruiting-star crazy...also, this could be Rhule signaling his Big Red donors I am gonna need more NIL money...
not sure Miami is the "used to be a major program but haven't come to grips with reality" model for Rhule to emulate
and, as one of their many former felon told us, they aren't competing with WI, IA and MN
People are confused about this. Offering cash in exchange for a commitment is not NIL. Such a transaction is pay-for-play and is still a violation of NCAA rules.Considering NIL isn't against the rules ... is Matt just advertising that he is getting outbid?
Packaging it as a part of NIL, or not ... really seems like same steps but minor differences.People are confused about this. Offering cash in exchange for a commitment is not NIL. Such a transaction is pay-for-play and is still a violation of NCAA rules.
The only difference is that now the cheaters are willing to be more brazen about it because they can fall back on NIL as a defense.
NIL is essentially like California's old medicinal marijuana laws. It creates an absolute path to this kind of behavior which would technically be against the rules but it would be impossible to prove.People are confused about this. Offering cash in exchange for a commitment is not NIL. Such a transaction is pay-for-play and is still a violation of NCAA rules.
The only difference is that now the cheaters are willing to be more brazen about it because they can fall back on NIL as a defense.
Just hang loose, bloodDo you speak jive?
Cut me some slack, Jack! Chump don' want no help, chump don't GET da help!Just hang loose, blood
The top one is Oregon, the bottom one is Miami (Florida).Translation for a guy who doesn't speak emoji or sub-Tweet?
Even worse: if you're trying to entice a player who is on someone else's roster to transfer, that is outright tampering.People are confused about this. Offering cash in exchange for a commitment is not NIL. Such a transaction is pay-for-play and is still a violation of NCAA rules.
The only difference is that now the cheaters are willing to be more brazen about it because they can fall back on NIL as a defense.
I was told by another poster there's no cheating and all this stuff is wonderful.People are confused about this. Offering cash in exchange for a commitment is not NIL. Such a transaction is pay-for-play and is still a violation of NCAA rules.
The only difference is that now the cheaters are willing to be more brazen about it because they can fall back on NIL as a defense.
That is the issue. The line between NIL and pay for play has become (intentionally) blurry, because there is no governance in-place. The NCAA is not set-up to regulate NIL, and it’s not clear that they have the legal authority to do so if if they could, and wanted to.Packaging it as a part of NIL, or not ... really seems like same steps but minor differences.
See a broad, to get that booty yak 'em, Leg 'er down 'n smack 'em yak 'em!Cut me some slack, Jack! Chump don' want no help, chump don't GET da help!
This isn’t going to stop unless the NCAA does something extreme, like quickly suspends a couple of high-profile programs for a couple of years. The problem is the NCAA has virtually no investigative authority. They would need to latch-on to something like an IRS investigation. And NIL was specifically designed to get IRS investigations OUT of D1 revenue sports.Even worse: if you're trying to entice a player who is on someone else's roster to transfer, that is outright tampering.
That is despicable and must be stopped at all costs.
I thought that was legal now.He is accusing those teams of using money to get players.
I mean technically pay for play is still illegal but of course we all know that is exactly what most NIL deals are in college football and basketball.I thought that was legal now.
Of course it is. And it's been going on probably since the beginning of college football - it's just all in the open now.I mean technically pay for play is still illegal but of course we all know that is exactly what most NIL deals are in college football and basketball.