Ignatius L Hoops
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2015
- Messages
- 10,543
- Reaction score
- 3,364
- Points
- 113
All that typing because it seems you don't know what the pairwise is?
I think I know the pairwise. I have a bias to the USAToday coaches, journalists poll and use that with the other USHO that is similar when taking about ranking.
Saying that publicly just shows it's amateur hour.Apparently the head of the committee said it was about selling tickets. The problem is Fargo is already sold out.
Just let the higher seeds host the first two rounds.
With only 16 teams, the competition gets really good really fast in the tournament. Number 6 vs number 8 isn't that different, they are both teams who are very good but not quite at the level of the best of the best. Either one could beat us in the second round if we don't play well and with intensity for 60 minutes, and we will beat either one if we do.I get the frustration, but all the whining on Twitter is a bit embarrassing. If we don’t make it out of Fargo, I’m blaming it on some sort of non-rational karma.
Sure, but if you're not going to do bracket integrity just draw random groups then for each at large bid with auto bids going against 1, 2, 3 as expected.With only 16 teams, the competition gets really good really fast in the tournament. Number 6 vs number 8 isn't that different, they are both teams who are very good but not quite at the level of the best of the best. Either one could beat us in the second round if we don't play well and with intensity for 60 minutes, and we will beat either one if we do.
I agree with this 100%. Yes, if you look at it... technically we got screwed. It has happened to teams many times in this tournament before and it will continue to happen unless they just have highest seeds host the regionals. Now it's time for us to STFU about it, stop whining on Twitter, and just support our team. Beat Canisius.With only 16 teams, the competition gets really good really fast in the tournament. Number 6 vs number 8 isn't that different, they are both teams who are very good but not quite at the level of the best of the best. Either one could beat us in the second round if we don't play well and with intensity for 60 minutes, and we will beat either one if we do.
They did just come in and show who the true #1 was IMO... deserving of what they ended up getting??Here are the regions with the USCHO and USA Hockey rankings, for reference. Michigan with the cakewalk.
#1/1 UMN
#24/24 Canisius
#6/6 St. Cloud
#10/9 Mankato
#2/2 Michigan
#19/19 Colgate
#10/11 PSU
#13/13 MTU
#3/3 Qpac
#14/14 Merrimack
#7/7 Harvard
#8/8 OSU
#4/4 DU
#12/12 Cornell
#5/5 BU
#9/11 WMU
Good visual. Here they are with pairwise, which we know is basically what they use to do the selections. First value shown is rank within the field of 16. Second ranking is vs all of college hockey.Here are the regions with the USCHO and USA Hockey rankings, for reference. Michigan with the cakewalk.
#1/1 UMN
#24/24 Canisius
#6/6 St. Cloud
#10/9 Mankato
#2/2 Michigan
#19/19 Colgate
#10/11 PSU
#13/13 MTU
#3/3 Qpac
#14/14 Merrimack
#7/7 Harvard
#8/8 OSU
#4/4 DU
#12/12 Cornell
#5/5 BU
#9/11 WMU
Look at a list of the oldest teams in college hockey most years. It's generally not good teams. Meanwhile 3 of last year's frozen four were among the youngest teams in the country.
What could go wrong.
Has nothing to do with who they thought was the true #1, it was about attendance/geography. Not saying that makes it right, but that paired with PSU being a host screwed us. We just won the B10 by 19 points over Michigan so they better not be calling them the true #1.They did just come in and show who the true #1 was IMO... deserving of what they ended up getting??
You've been saying all year they're better than the good guys once they have their full roster available, looks like others agreed!
The gophers just need to show they can fight through adversity, which honestly I haven't seen them do in quite a few years!
Hopefully they'll use this as motivation and Motzko will see that angle as well..
20 years is a long time, and I don't see a better chance than this one in the next few including with Eiserman.Just win baby...
My biggest issue is how poorly the big ten readies their teams for the hockey tournament.
Minnesota has played 2 games since beating Ohio state on February 25th. That’s two games over the course of 4 weeks.
Penn state has not played a game since March 5th losing to Ohio state. Again 3 weeks off not playing a game.
Ohio state has played 1 game since they beat Penn state on March 5th. That game was at Michigan on March 11th.
Michigan has played 2 games since they beat Wisconsin on March 4th. They beat Ohio state on March 11th and beat Minnesota on March 18th.
Meanwhile Minnesotas region has 3 teams that just got done winning a true conference tournament. The big ten needs more teams and at this point I don’t care who they are.