Gophers_4life
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2018
- Messages
- 15,846
- Reaction score
- 3,986
- Points
- 113
Also, Warren is 100% correct that it is absolutely critical to end ESPN's monopoly on the CFP.
Guessing it won't let you skip through commercials -- if it allows any kind of delayed viewing at all.FWIW, if NBC ends up carrying BG10 games, that works for me. I used the Peacock app extensively for the first time recently for both the British Open and the Tour de France and came away really impressed. It's top notch compared to most others.
Guessing it won't let you skip through commercials -- if it allows any kind of delayed viewing at all.
Which is exactly what they want to prevent you from doing! (unless you pay extra)
Agreed, though I do like "The Bear" guy on GameDay for some reason.
For sure.Also, Warren is 100% correct that it is absolutely critical to end ESPN's monopoly on the CFP.
The estimates were around 100 million per school before USC and UCLA were added…so if it’s less than 1.6 billion I’ll be a little disappointed in the negotiating teamSo we're looking at $700 million between NBC and CBS. Streaming is probably $100-200 million. Fox would be $500 million.
Are we talking about a $1.4 billion package just for these rights?
Was that $100 million from this deal alone, or all athletic payouts like bowl games, NCAA Tournament appearances, etc.?The estimates were around 100 million per school before USC and UCLA were added…so if it’s less than 1.6 billion I’ll be a little disappointed in the negotiating team
I think that $100M per year per school figure is with everything. All revenue sources that come into the Big Ten. CFP money, Bowl game money, March Madness money. So thinking that extra stuff is $10-20M per year per school above the main TV deal.The estimates were around 100 million per school before USC and UCLA were added…so if it’s less than 1.6 billion I’ll be a little disappointed in the negotiating team
I could see $700M NBC+CBS, $4-500M Fox, and $100M all else (any other streaming like Apple/Amazon, and then BTN for the remainder). NBC's chunk probably includes the games on Peacock (not a separate deal).So we're looking at $700 million between NBC and CBS. Streaming is probably $100-200 million. Fox would be $500 million.
Are we talking about a $1.4 billion package just for these rights?
AhI think that $100M per year per school figure is with everything. All revenue sources that come into the Big Ten. CFP money, Bowl game money, March Madness money. So thinking that extra stuff is $10-20M per year per school above the main TV deal.
As is the case with the ACC, ESPN now owns all-things-SEC through the mid/late 2030’s. CBS’s old “game of the week” rights are worth about 1/3 of all SEC media rights.The SEC still has a lot of content to sell, as part of the main package that I'm sure multiple TV networks will bid for, just like with the Big Ten.
Ah ... I see. Yep, I was wrong. You're right on this.As is the case with the ACC, ESPN now owns all-things-SEC through the mid/late 2030’s. CBS’s old “game of the week” rights are worth about 1/3 of all SEC media rights.
I keep hearing that ESPN will agree to renegotiate their contract because of the TX and OK additions. But the only reason ESPN would ever do that is if there is some very serious doubts that TX and OK are actually going to make move.
I'm really hoping it's not going to be on AppleTV+. Like you say, that would be just another monthly bill.Rumor is there is another streaming package up for sale too like I feared. That really sucks. What was once available entirely on cable, YouTube TV, etc will now require that plus another streaming package.
And that’s just for the B1G, the good days of every power conference college football game being on tv are over.
My hunch is Peacock because of the B1G throwing NBC a bone as a thank you for the hundreds of millions of dollars, but I think it will be ATV+ if it’s not Peacock.I'm really hoping it's not going to be on AppleTV+. Like you say, that would be just another monthly bill.
If it's on Amazon Prime Video, at least, well I already have Prime, so no more there.
Agree. Apple TV would suck.I'm really hoping it's not going to be on AppleTV+. Like you say, that would be just another monthly bill.
If it's on Amazon Prime Video, at least, well I already have Prime, so no more there.
Oh goodness, 2 streaming deals? Well then I guess I don’t care who wins between Amazon and Apple. As long as it’s not a bolt on package to those services.Peacock is already guaranteed. That was part of the package that NBC is paying for.
This is another streaming package. I believe I read that Apple and Amazon are the two bidding on it.
I hope between those two, they kill of BTN+. Thing is such a joke ... charge people $5/month to throw up, sometimes very poorly done, student productions or at worse just a damn static webcam pointed at the game/match.
As far as I know with Peacock, you can get that for free, if you watch with ads. If you pay extra, you can skip ads. Not sure if that will hold with sports.
One downside though is no dvr option with that. Found that out with premier league soccer. I don't know if they save past broadcasts for later viewing in any way?I know if you have Xfinity cable, that Peacock (including sports) is included. Just use your Xfinity login to access.
Can you fast forward in the replay?Peacock has replay. At least they do for EPL. Not sure how long it sticks around though.
But I can definitely watch last weekends EPL matches right now. Even the game that was on TV has the replay available.
Yep. After an initial 30 second ad it appears to be open to do whatever you want. Just don’t know how long it sticks around.Can you fast forward in the replay?