Agree you can add those three. Probably Mulvey and maybe Van Da Veer? I’m talking all american, best player on their team, Olympian level. Former players? Yeah but mostly they don’t pan out or don’t even try coaching. It can be tough for that level of elite athlete to be able to work with people who continually aren’t as good as them. Just wired a little differently.
I dont think it has a lot to do with the debate of 'great players make great coaches?', I think it has more to do with how you communicate with kids, do you have a message and is it clear.
Dawn Staley is a great communicator, her post game speech was inspiring, she was articulate. If you talk to Dawn, do you leave the conversation feeling inspired and motivated - I would say yes.
I think Geno used to be like that and I dont think kids relate to him as much anymore. Before Paige, UCONN was fading, in my opinion if Geno wouldn't of got Paige he would be retired.
The other thing I would add is there is leadership on the court, but do you have the leadership to build a staff and to lead them in more of a 'corporate america' standpoint, thats way different then leading on the court.
I dont believe the statement "tough for that level of elite athlete to be able to work with people who continually aren’t as good as them".. There are better shooters then Whalen, there better defenders, there are quicker players, so your job as a coach is to bring all those skillsets together.
Some of the best coaches are like salesman, they can sell you something and you buy it. I don't believe Whalen's strength is going to be 'salesman' and we'll see over time if she adapts.