I posted some stats in an earlier post. But here we go:
| Opponent (2024) | PFF Grade | Passer Rating Allowed | Missed Tackles |
| N. Carolina | 68.4 | 79.2 | 0 |
| Rhode Island | 74.5 | 39.6 (1 INT) | 0 |
| Nevada | 70.1 | 56.1 | 0 |
| Iowa | 64.2 | 84.5 | 1 |
| at Michigan | 61.3 | 77.4 | 1 |
| USC | 91.3 | 12.4 (1 INT) | 0 |
| at UCLA | 89.5 | 15.8 (1 INT) | 0 |
| Maryland | 80.2 | 22.1 (1 INT) | 0 |
| at Illinois | 75.4 | 88.2 | 1 |
| at Rutgers | 77.8 | 64.1 | 1 |
| Penn State | 71.2 | 92.4 | 1 |
| at Wisconsin | 82.1 | 44.5 | 0 |
| VA Tech (Bowl) | 84.4 | 32.1 (1 INT) | 1 |
| SEASON TOTAL | 88.9 | 25.6 | 6 |
| Opponent (2025) | PFF Grade | Passer Rating Allowed | Missed Tackles |
| Buffalo | 71.2 | 56.3 | 1 |
| NW State | 82.4 | 39.6 | 0 |
| at California | 49.7 | 118.9 | 3 |
| Rutgers | 61.7 | 84.2 | 2 |
| at Ohio State | 53.2 | 132.4 | 4 |
| Purdue | 76.5 | 42.1 | 1 |
| Nebraska | 58.4 | 92.8 | 2 |
| at Iowa | 51.4 | 110.2 | 3 |
| Michigan St | 56.1 | 95.7 | 2 |
| at Oregon | 48.2 | 148.8 | 2 |
| at NW | 78.9 | 62.4 | 1 |
| Wisconsin | 59.8 | 98.2 | 1 |
| Rate Bowl | 69.7 | 78.4 | 1 |
| SEASON TOTAL | 62.4 | 126.3 | 23 |
A PFF of 62.4 at the P4 level is average to backup level. Below 60 is replaceable. A PFF of 88.9 is almost elite, so we'll call it elite for ease of comparison. Take out Buffalo, NW State - before the Cal calamity, and the Rate Bowl, where it looked like the coaching staff tossed him the 2 way bone again, his PFF was 59.4. Benchable on many other teams. For a Travis Hunter V2, these are catastrophic numbers. For NFL scouts, these are massive red flags.
PFF isn't a perfect metric by any means, but it is the closest thing to "blue book" value that is universally used and understood. When combined with the passer rating and "eye test"
@Tucker32 referenced, yeah, I'm not making a 7 figure investment unless it is loaded with performance incentives, which he probably doesn't want.