GopherinFlorida
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,655
- Reaction score
- 433
- Points
- 83
On the surface...would a Kill hire be better, worse or equal to the Brewster hire?
IMO, it's equal. Both coaches have serious unprovens and might do well or poorly. Brewster was a proven recruiter and position coach but had never run a program before.
Kill is a proven HC that has run much smaller programs well...but there is no proof he can recruit the talent needed to be successful...plus handle the pressure of a Big Ten program. Further, his health is an issue and can he handle the rigors of the recruiting travel, pressure of winning in the Big Ten and the in season hours of scheming and planning. Hate to hire this guy and he keels over from a gall stones in the 3 week of next season.
IMO, it's equal. Both coaches have serious unprovens and might do well or poorly. Brewster was a proven recruiter and position coach but had never run a program before.
Kill is a proven HC that has run much smaller programs well...but there is no proof he can recruit the talent needed to be successful...plus handle the pressure of a Big Ten program. Further, his health is an issue and can he handle the rigors of the recruiting travel, pressure of winning in the Big Ten and the in season hours of scheming and planning. Hate to hire this guy and he keels over from a gall stones in the 3 week of next season.