underground629
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 9, 2009
- Messages
- 3,459
- Reaction score
- 64
- Points
- 48
Good points. I get the idea scher thinks we're born as blank slates and that if you just put your mind to it...
"Oto.. can't shoot", "Elliot... can't shoot." Your words contradict your point that a shooter is created and not born. Oto, EE and Coleman practice their shot 7 days a week. My guess is that they shoot hundreds of shots per day. A published story discussed how Coleman had worked all summer on his shot/game with his brother Dan. Yet he is at best a streaky shooter and when he starts off bad forget it. Tubby has sat him for long stretches when he starts bad and explained the situation in the press. Is he a better shooter than he was when his game at Hopkins was to explode to the hole against Mn HS opposition? Yes. But it is a stretch to say he is "a very good shooter". Furthermore if what you claim about nurture vs nature is true, every crazy for basketball, practice endlessly high school player would be raining 3s all night long. Practice can make most players better but great shooters have talent they are born with. I would wager a huge sum that Reggie Miller could get on the court with no practice for a month a drain a high percentage of 3s and bury the well-practiced pick-up game player.