GophersInIowa
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 44,056
- Reaction score
- 26,537
- Points
- 113
Oh, lord. I suppose it's possible this entire thread is an April Fool's joke, but sadly, I suspect most of the people posting here are serious.
The truth, as it is in most things, lies somewhere in the middle.
The program that Fleck inherited is not great - but it's not terrible. It's somewhere in the middle. I hate to bring it up again, but the Gophers did win 9 games last year. Most - (not all) coaching changes are made when a program is struggling. Most new coaches do not inherit a program coming off a 9-win season, including a bowl win upset victory. AT the same time - (trying to be fair here), most coaches do not inherit a program that had a sex scandal and players being expelled. This is a fairly unique situation.
I can see both sides of the debate. I can understand why Kill thinks the work he and Claeys did is being undervalued by Fleck. And I can understand that Fleck defines the term "culture" much differently than many other people do. This is essentially two people (Kill and Fleck) from different generations, different outlooks, and different styles. It's not surprising they might not understand each other.
AND - I will say this. Some people on this board are trying too hard to defend Kill. Some people on this board are trying too hard to defend Fleck. That has led to people from both sides making regrettable statements. I would like to encourage everyone to take a deep breath and dial it back a notch.
I wish I could just step into a cryogenic chamber and emerge 10 minutes before kickoff for the season opener. All of the BS is making it very hard for me to be excited or optimistic about Gopher Football. At least I have the Twins to look forward too...................................does anyone have any razor blades?
The best post in this entire thread.