Ski U Master
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 5,409
- Reaction score
- 354
- Points
- 83
Well, FOT and others certainly turned this thread into a heaping pile of manure.
Well, FOT and others certainly turned this thread into a heaping pile of manure.
In the history of the football series with the stinking badgers, the numbers read like this:
Minnesota 59 wins
wisky 53 wins
there have been 8 ties.
NOW comes the BIGGIE friend of tubby:
In Basketball, Minnesota has 92 wins vs. wisky and 87 losses. Once again, Minnesota holds the head to head competition edge over the stinking wisky badgers.
That, of course is NOT to brag about how the Gophers have done. No, not at all friend of tubby. That is ONLY to let you know that you are making a BAD argument...a flawed argument...a failed argument. During that period of time, there were times when the Gophers had long runs of success against the stinking badgers and there have also been times when the stinking badgers have had long runs of success against the Gophers. But, in the end, the Gophers have beaten the stinking badgers MORE than the stinking badgers have beaten the Gophers.
Now, on to the bigger question: why hasn't our 2 million dollar plus man, Tubby done a LOT better in the Big Ten Conference than he has??????
THAT is the only concern right now. badger joel maturi overpaid for Tubby big time, it appears.
I like Tubby just fine and think he's a pretty decent coach. However, based upon what he has achieved here, he certainly is WAY over paid.
I would guess he can stay here in his over paid situation for pretty much as long as he wants. I certainly wouldn't automatically recommend that if Georgia Tech wants to offer to pay him more than Minnesota that Minnesota should automatically match their offer...up their offer and offer a long-term even MORE over-paid contract for a 500 Big Ten life-time record or less though. There truely IS a point of diminishing returns. The BARN still isn't selling out.
But, just remember those numbers about Minnesota VS wisky in football AND in basketball friend of tubby. Minnesota has a 59 to 53 advantage and they have tied 8 times out of 120 meetings since 1890. And in hoops, the advantage is 92 to 87 in favor of the Gophers over the stinking badgers starting in 1900.
*Thanks to Eric Thrall and his history of Minnesota Football & Basketball site!
jeeeze.........those who think tradition means anything going forward? Our "LONg AGO" tradition verses OSU and Wisconsin is not resolvent to blue chip athletes. All the kids have seen Wisconsin on national TV beating good teams and competing. They have seen OSU dominate in all sports......that is all Blue Chip Athletes care about.
Sorry but Gopher fans should DEMAND MORE from their sports teams. Their history is subpar. Minnesota has plenty of resources to do MUCH BETTER going forward.
Gophers have 2 B10 football titles since WW2 and 4 B10 basketball titles since The Barn opened in 1920's.
Wisconsin > Gophers in terms of football or basketball tradition.
I can say to you Xman....current recruits dont give a rats butt about the Gophers of the 30's and 40's.........it means NOTHING to a recruit in today's world.
Everyone is dodging the question. Gophers have 4 B10 basketball titles in 80+ years and 2 B10 football titles in 60+ years. The strong Gopher tradition is 100 years ago.
No, you're dodging the question you brought up yourself. You keep pointing out the minnesota numbers. Not once have I seen you throw out Wisconsin numbers to prove they are better. You simply state because of our lack of success, they are better. Before 1990, please show me their success. Please.
What a tool.
I'm scratching my head trying to figure out why a Purdue fan who only cares about Gopher basketball because he met a guy once in a hotel lobby feels it necessary to stir the pot amongst Gopher and Badger fans.
Actually, he referenced some numbers, but they were carefully tailored to support his opinion. For instance, he used different time frames for both football and basketball in an effort to make his stats viable. He didn't include the same time frame to both nor did he cover the overall numbers of either school. Instead, he used arbitrary time frames to support his view.
This is possibly one of the worst threads ever on GopherHole, and that's really saying something.
You can argue either side for basketball, but football is so lopsided historically in Minnesota's favor that it's not even up for debate. Nearly every statistic - all time wins, win/loss %, National titles, Big Ten titles, head-to-head records - favors Minnesota. The only one that doesn't is bowl records, which is essentially meaningless in the overall historical context because Wisconsin has the good fortune of being better in the post-1975 Big Ten multi-bowl era. Just a stupid, silly argument.