Rosemountian
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2010
- Messages
- 3,029
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
If using words as what they actually mean constitutes me as a "tool", then put a price tag on me and hang me up in Hardware Hank.
Consider yourself tagged.
If using words as what they actually mean constitutes me as a "tool", then put a price tag on me and hang me up in Hardware Hank.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...big-ten-part-one-the-minnesota-golden-gophers
For those who don't click on links, the writer thinks the best this team can do is 6-6, the worst case scenario, which happens to be his "official" prediction is 2-10. Anything is possible, but I can't envision any scenario where the Gophers don't win a conference game.
We were a truly awful team last year
I am prepared for being shut out by Iowa again...
Please people, stop linking bleacherreport.com articles.
Would you link some random fan's opinion on the upcoming season from another site and start a thread about it?
ANYONE can write an article on bleacherreport.com.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...big-ten-part-one-the-minnesota-golden-gophers
For those who don't click on links, the writer thinks the best this team can do is 6-6, the worst case scenario, which happens to be his "official" prediction is 2-10. Anything is possible, but I can't envision any scenario where the Gophers don't win a conference game.
Wisconsin is always a close game. Even in the worst season in Gopher history (2007) that game was decided by a TD.
Well, not always. Over the last 35 seasons, there have been 14 semi-blowouts (defined as a final score differential of 12 points or more (more than a TD and FG)), 9 complete blowouts (21 or more points). I think if you had said the final score is usually closer than it should be, you'd be right.
Just to be fair with that one, I was at that game. The 2001 team beat Wisconsin & Michigan State, lost to OSU by 3 points, and lost to Big Ten champ Illinois by 9.
That Chester Taylor-led Toledo team would have finished top-3 in the Big Ten in 2001, without a doubt. That wasn't a matter of not being ready for a road opener; that was a matter of a football team being a lot better than the Gophers.
Hopefully the Gophers are ready, one game at a time.
2-10 is NOT possible. Not with the senior QB leadership Weber will ultimately be providing. Not even a slight possibility.
Well, your brain cavity has been empty far longer.
I was at the spring game. After watching the team for only a half, then looking at the schedule, I can honestly say that I told the guys next to me that I didn't see a loss on the schedule. This team can AND WILL beat everyone on the schedule:
- @Middle Tennessee St - We've never lost a game in this stadium. I don't see this being the first one - W
- South Dakota - Easiest game on the schedule - W
- USC - USC is not that good, especially defensively against the run. Kiffin is in his first year there. I think the Gophers can take this at home. - W
- Northern Illinois - They almost stole one in 2008. We will not overlook them. - W
- Northwestern - They lose their QB and a slew of receivers on offense, McManus and Wooton on D. Should be an easy W. - W
- @Wisconsin - They run like 5 plays. Piece of cake. - W
- @Purdue - We won there last time against a better Purdue team. - W
- Penn State - No Darryl Clark, no problem. - W
- Ohio State - 2nd easiest game on the schedule - W
- @Michigan State - If you can beat USC and Ohio State, this one is probably a 20 point blowout. - W
- @Illinois - If you are a Ron Zook believer, chalk this up as an Illinois win. I didn't think so. - W
- Iowa - Two words: Ricky Stanzi Interceptions - W
I don't know if Bleacherreport.com was around 3 years ago, but if some clown had posted a 2-10 prediction in the spring of 2007, I suspect it would have provoked a similar response from many of the Gopher faithful. And we all know how that turned out. 2-10 would have been a stretch goal.
Like many others, I will be shocked and disappointed if we finish that poorly this year IMHO, 5-7 is probably the most likely outcome. But if the 2007 season taught us anything, it is "never say NEVER".
That's a much better way of phrasing things. I guess it's possible that the new Marmaduke movie could win the 2010 Oscar for Best Picture, but it'd wager it's really not very likely.Even a blind dog finds a bone once in a while. The question is whether 2-10 is a reasonable prediction.
+1
I can see where a casual fan who doesn't follow the Gophers would think the defense is going to be terrible this year with 9 starters gone. The thing those people realize is that many of the guys who will start this year saw significant PT last year. Also, the guys replacing the departed 9 starters are bigger up front and far more athletic across the board.
Therefore, I will be surprised if our D isn't the best it has been in a long time. Also, I believe the O-line is much improved from a year ago which will take pressure off our QBs.
from the article
'the bad news is it might not matter. Ultimately, there is no way the Gophers will beat the elite teams—OSU, Iowa, Wisconsin, and PSU—of this year's Big Ten.'
Wisconsin is always a close game. Even in the worst season in Gopher history (2007) that game was decided by a TD. Plus, people underestimate how much losing O'Brien Shoffield will hurt the Badger D. PSU is going to be worse than anyone thinks they will be due to the Nits QB/O-line issues. No chance we beat next year's National Champion Ohio State, and Iowa would be tough to beat (but again, it's a rivalry game. If McKnight doesn't drop a TD pass in the first quarter last year that game could have been an entirely different story).
However, I believe the Gophers are more talented than Northwestern or Purdue. I think we have a good shot at Michigan State. Illinois is a mess, and after last year's embarrassing loss to the Illini the Gophers should be extremely focused when they head to Champaign.
I believe this team wins 7+ games this year, with an upset of either Wisconsin or Penn State.[/QUOTE]
Still going with this, Allie?
Still going with this, Allie?
I'd say he's about right. I have us at 4-8, so two wins either way is in play. I haven't felt this down on a Gopher football team before the season since the Wacker years. We were a truly awful team last year and I don't see how the product will be any better this year. But hey, sometimes things all come together and the team surprises everyone. I'm all for letting things play out on their own, but I am prepared for being shut out by Iowa again...
+1
I can see where a casual fan who doesn't follow the Gophers would think the defense is going to be terrible this year with 9 starters gone. The thing those people realize is that many of the guys who will start this year saw significant PT last year. Also, the guys replacing the departed 9 starters are bigger up front and far more athletic across the board.
Therefore, I will be surprised if our D isn't the best it has been in a long time. Also, I believe the O-line is much improved from a year ago which will take pressure off our QBs.
from the article
'the bad news is it might not matter. Ultimately, there is no way the Gophers will beat the elite teams—OSU, Iowa, Wisconsin, and PSU—of this year's Big Ten.'
Wisconsin is always a close game. Even in the worst season in Gopher history (2007) that game was decided by a TD. Plus, people underestimate how much losing O'Brien Shoffield will hurt the Badger D. PSU is going to be worse than anyone thinks they will be due to the Nits QB/O-line issues. No chance we beat next year's National Champion Ohio State, and Iowa would be tough to beat (but again, it's a rivalry game. If McKnight doesn't drop a TD pass in the first quarter last year that game could have been an entirely different story).
However, I believe the Gophers are more talented than Northwestern or Purdue. I think we have a good shot at Michigan State. Illinois is a mess, and after last year's embarrassing loss to the Illini the Gophers should be extremely focused when they head to Champaign.
I believe this team wins 7+ games this year, with an upset of either Wisconsin or Penn State.
Now that's funny.+1
I can see where a casual fan who doesn't follow the Gophers would think the defense is going to be terrible this year with 9 starters gone. The thing those people realize is that many of the guys who will start this year saw significant PT last year. Also, the guys replacing the departed 9 starters are bigger up front and far more athletic across the board.
Therefore, I will be surprised if our D isn't the best it has been in a long time. Also, I believe the O-line is much improved from a year ago which will take pressure off our QBs.
from the article
'the bad news is it might not matter. Ultimately, there is no way the Gophers will beat the elite teams—OSU, Iowa, Wisconsin, and PSU—of this year's Big Ten.'
Wisconsin is always a close game. Even in the worst season in Gopher history (2007) that game was decided by a TD. Plus, people underestimate how much losing O'Brien Shoffield will hurt the Badger D. PSU is going to be worse than anyone thinks they will be due to the Nits QB/O-line issues. No chance we beat next year's National Champion Ohio State, and Iowa would be tough to beat (but again, it's a rivalry game. If McKnight doesn't drop a TD pass in the first quarter last year that game could have been an entirely different story).
However, I believe the Gophers are more talented than Northwestern or Purdue. I think we have a good shot at Michigan State. Illinois is a mess, and after last year's embarrassing loss to the Illini the Gophers should be extremely focused when they head to Champaign.
I believe this team wins 7+ games this year, with an upset of either Wisconsin or Penn State.