If Weber were not "local", I believe he would have been benched weeks ago. It is political.
Right. Because we all know coaches are willing to put less than their best team out there because of politics.
/sarc off
No intention to give Weber a pass here. From what I could see - limited mostly to TV, and even then not all the games - the only receiver Weber really trusted while he was there was Decker. After Decker, the only receiver I saw that impressed me even a bit was Tow-Arnett. In terms of Weber's future development, losing Decker was probably a blessing long term ... at some point he has to read defenses and go where the defense dictates the ball go.
It's not that easy, folks. Tim Tebow's been less effective in the passing game this year - and he's a third year starter running the same offense he's been training in for four years. What was different? Percy Harvin & Louis Murphy, both of whom Tebow trusted implicitly, are now in the NFL; Tim's working with a new group of starters who don't draw anywhere near the same coverages as the group he had last year.
Here's what I think you'd see if you had a "candid" film session with Brewster: Weber missing reads; Receivers running the wrong route; Weber & Receivers reading the defense differently; O-Line blowing protection schemes; bad throws; dropped balls; good defensive plays; and, of course, a fair number of completions.
I don't think the offense is anywhere near "getting it". It's disappointing, but not surprising - I've seen it take almost two full seasons for an offense to
really understand to the point where the "drive killer" mistakes subside.
Last thing - if Gray was better than Weber in practice, he'd be playing more. A coach's only job security is to win games; "politics" isn't going to keep a lesser player on the field.