If Taylor is ready for the Ducks, do we play him or do we save him for "winnable" games?

Donate To GopherHole


You’re paying him how much? He needs to play as many games as possible.
 


If he's ready and you don't play him, what is the message to the team? "We are good enough to win without him so why risk further injury? Let's up the odds that we'll have him for the finish." Or is it "We are just not good enough to beat Oregon, with or without him, but we can beat Northwestern and Wisconsin if we have him intact."
 




He won’t play the remainder of the season and will put in for medical redshirt.
 

Big Dawg said:
He won’t play the remainder of the season and will put in for medical redshirt.
Click to expand...
If this qualifies, sit him. But if it doesn't, we need all the weapons we can get on the field.
 




We should also wonder: Do we continue to hide offensive plays for the winnable games? Lol
 


Oregon is not a winnable game??????? If so, we should probably just not play the rest of the season......

Did you watch their home game vs. the Badgers? 7-0 at halftime and the stinking Badgers were very much in the game until the 4th quarter.....
 



What are we saving him for? He needs to play football if he wants his pay day next spring.
 

Wow....almost every reply is in agreement that if he is healthy he plays.....that is a rarity around here.

And I agree, if Taylor is healthy he plays.
 

The minute you give up on a game before the opening kickoff, is the moment you lose me as a fan.
 


Fans can think a game is not winnable, coaches maybe think it, but the players….if they get that feeling, the program is done.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom