agreedNo. 8-5 is a mediocre season in a year they should win the west.
I like your take but be honest, not beating both rivals this year would be huge failure.I think it is pretty clear we lost a lot more on the offensive side of the ball last year than we thought earlier in the season, then CRAB got hurt.
I go to games for entertainment. I don't really understand what underpins people's idea of "should" or anything like that. As best can tell folks feel we "should" always get better, but that sort of clashes with ... any experience I've ever had with sports ever ...
It has been an entertianning season for me so that's great. Beat Iowa, I'll say very entertainning.
I have no idea what people's measuring sticks to come up with these kinds of statements...I like your take but be honest, not beating both rivals this year would be huge failure.
If you can't beat them when they are down, when can you? My measuring stick is to beat your rivals and the rest will come.I have no idea what people's measuring sticks to come up with these kinds of statements...
I think Michigan hasn't beaten both their main rivals in the same year in somewhere around 20 years.
When can we?If you can't beat them when they are down, when can you? My measuring stick is to beat your rivals and the rest will come.
No. Minimum in my eyes is 9 wins with a bowl win to be successful vs expectations.IF......
1) we beat Iowa (yea!)
2) then lose to Wiscy and then lose whatever Bowl game we are in, to finish 8-5.
Is that representing a successful season?
I would vote yes. Because of 1)
That is a tough one. Would probably hinge on how we lost to Wisconsin and who we played in the bowl game.IF......
1) we beat Iowa (yea!)
2) then lose to Wiscy and then lose whatever Bowl game we are in, to finish 8-5.
Is that representing a successful season?
I would vote yes. Because of 1)
Yeah I said at the beginning anything less than west is disappointing but anything 8 or more (regular season) is a success.Disappointing but successful, yes.
Can't be mad at eight wins, but I think for this group, that was expected to win the West it would be a disappointment. Next year when we have an away game at UNC and crossover games with both Michigan and Ohio State eight wins would be a good year. We haven't beat both Iowa and Wisconsin since the days of Darrell Thompson, might as well do it with the guy whose going to break all of his records.IF......
1) we beat Iowa (yea!)
2) then lose to Wiscy and then lose whatever Bowl game we are in, to finish 8-5.
Is that representing a successful season?
I would vote yes. Because of 1)
Agree. Eight wins in the regular season should be the floor expectation in most years, and depending on who those wins/losses are against determines whether I have some disappointment.Yeah I said at the beginning anything less than west is disappointing but anything 8 or more (regular season) is a success.
8 or more has us with a winning big ten season in 3 of 4 seasons
Last happened 65-69
8 or more has us winning big ten seasons 3 non Covid seasons in a row.
Last happened 60-62
A season can be both successful and dissapointing.IF......
1) we beat Iowa (yea!)
2) then lose to Wiscy and then lose whatever Bowl game we are in, to finish 8-5.
Is that representing a successful season?
I would vote yes. Because of 1)
THISI am happy that with PJ (andKill/Claeys) we have reached the stage at which 8 wins is disappointing.
I take a wider view of the season. I don't really have any additional enthusiasm for so-called rivalry games. Whoever lines up facing my team at the kickoff is my rival. I'd like the Gophers to beat Iowa and Wisconsin just like I'd like them to beat Rutgers and Northwestern. I enjoy good execution on the field. As to rating a successful season, the Gophers have already done that this year. More wins are a bonus to me.IF......
1) we beat Iowa (yea!)
2) then lose to Wiscy and then lose whatever Bowl game we are in, to finish 8-5.
Is that representing a successful season?
I would vote yes. Because of 1)