Ryan James
Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2009
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
You are right FoT, you are right.
If a certain person had given the PG spot to the better player, we'd still be a top 25 team with a very good chance to be a sweet 16 type team.
FTFY.
FTFY.
Look, Chef, you can argue that Joseph is a better basketball player. That's at least a defensible argument.
One cannot, however, seriously argue that Joseph is a better PG than Nolen. It's so stupid as to make one wonder whether your constant harping on the issue is serious or satirical.
Did you watch the team last season when Joseph was given the chance to settle in at PG?
Joseph is a better basketball player, and was the better option at PG for the Gophers given the alternative(s). Nolen's offensive limitations were too much to overcome, and hurt the Gopher's halfcourt 'offense' too much to make up for his slight defensive and quickness advantages.
Joseph is a better basketball player, and was the better option at PG for the Gophers given the alternative(s). Nolen's offensive limitations were too much to overcome, and hurt the Gopher's halfcourt 'offense' too much to make up for his slight defensive and quickness advantages.
Did you watch the team last season when Joseph was given the chance to settle in at PG?
Joseph is a better basketball player, and was the better option at PG for the Gophers given the alternative(s). Nolen's offensive limitations were too much to overcome, and hurt the Gopher's halfcourt 'offense' too much to make up for his slight defensive and quickness advantages.
You're right, Nolen really killed the Gophers offensively against Louisville....Butler....last year vs Ohio State....this year against UNC.....West Virginia.....Purdue.....
Yeah, perhaps you're right. Offense hasn't been the Gophers problem over the past 3+ years. They have such an abundance of scorers on this team that a non-threat at PG doesn't hurt.
Perhaps it's another message board where 90% of the posters complain about the Gopher half court offense...all while defending the PG who nobody even bothers to defend. My bad.
Wait....so your only "source" is GopherHole? And then you quote a statistic that is completely made up and untrue? Hmm...you are definitely building a credible argument here....way to provide a rebuttal to my original examples as well.
On another team, without "where are the points going to come from" as an issue, Nolen might be a better choice. For the Gophers, he wasn't.
Chief - why is it so blatantly mutually exclusive for you?
Dewho would have averaged 25+ minutes per game had he not been a selfish, gutless quitter. Probably about 10 of those minutes would have been at PG. We would have seen a lot of 3 G offense. Not to mention that when Al went down, he would have logged 35+ minutes at PG.
QUOTE]
I'm going to take this one step further. IMO Devoe, Blake and Al would all be starting and playing major miniutes down the stretch and tournament time. Probably as much as 35 miniutes per game each. I could see Rodney coming off the bench at the 3 and even some time at the 4 when they wanted to go 'smaller'.
Chief, if all three were available would you 'start and play' all three or would you put one on the bench(presumably Al) and then who would be the other starter? If Al and Devoe were playing together who would be the pg?
Waiting to hear.
At crunch time Hoff made two bad plays. You expect that from a freshman, not a senior. He is also killing us on defense. Tubby should have gone to a box/1 with Hollins covering Battle. They now are in a position that they need to win the three home games. Hoff has been a good player for the Gophers and he is playing out of position, but quit trying to cover his ass guys. If you asked Hoff he would tell you the same thing. "I made two bad plays that lost the game"
+1 on the box/1
'i want to know what flavor of gum he is chewing'.
dboy...the flavor of your gum is $hit because remember, Sullinger is over rated.
I am with you Underground. I also played the perimeter as a PG, and honestly, I preferred man-to-man over a 2/3. I felt as a guard in a 2/3, I had more ground to cover than if I could just man up on someone and I felt it took away some of my aggressiveness. I also know what it was like to have a slower person (i.e. Colt) on the bottom on my side. You always knew that the recovery from that player would be a step slow, so there were times when I tried to cheat that way.
Colt played a great game last night, but he very much is out of position on the bottom wing of a 2/3 zone. And, as you mention, our guards (w/out Al) are very slow to react and close. I think that they can still utilize the 2/3 zone this year with the current roster, but it should be a more situational setup, rather than our base defense.
it's called an exaggeration to make a point.
Joseph at PG added a scorer, meant more and better looks for Hoffarber, and fewer collapsing defenses for the bigs to contend with. I'd happily settle for 10 more points of offense per game if it meant 5 more points allowed on defense, and for the record, Nolen is vastly overrated as a defender by many.
That's convenient how you calculated those stats. I also liked the better looks for Hoffarber part. And Devoe was so good at driving by his man and dishing... Nolen could never beat his man off the dribble or stay with his man like Devoe...