I hate that you are correct about this, but you are.Love is the best player overall but I think a non-QB has to have a historic season to win it. I went with Mendoza.
I've said that too, this feels like an historically weak Heisman finalist group. Mendoza's a very nice player, but he absolutely pales against most of the great QBs of the last 40 years or so.Is it just me or is this an extremely weak Heisman year as far as the actual numbers the candidates put up?
I agree. Really weak group.I've said that too, this feels like an historically weak Heisman finalist group. Mendoza's a very nice player, but he absolutely pales against most of the great QBs of the last 40 years or so.
I don’t think this season has as good of teams eitherI agree. Really weak group.
I don’t think drake fits their scheme well. So I don’t think soSo, if IU had called Drake Lindsey then Drake would be a Heisman trophy winner.
Not sure but he has quickly become extremely unlikeable. In an interview after the ceremony, he said “f**k you to the voters”. Then held a sign that said “f**k Indiana” at a club afterwards,Was Pavia’s mom there?![]()
Someone called him the Diet Coke version of Manziel....I'm sure Pavia has his posse, but the guy is a classless pr*ck. And that's just the football part of the equation. His eligibility case is going to f*ck things up royally. I think one of the reasons voters didn't cast a ballot for him is that he should have been out of eligibility.
I think he was the best guy and I would’ve voted for himI'm sure Pavia has his posse, but the guy is a classless pr*ck. And that's just the football part of the equation. His eligibility case is going to f*ck things up royally. I think one of the reasons voters didn't cast a ballot for him is that he should have been out of eligibility.