MplsGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
- Messages
- 36,668
- Reaction score
- 10,149
- Points
- 113
Injury from the bowl game against Syracuse could be tweaked/nagging him?
This x 1000.on the Gopher Gridiron Podcast, former Gopher OL Derek Burns had an interesting point. He said Athan tends to have the most success against Man defenses, and he struggles more against Zones.
According to Burns, that comes down to being able to read defenses and make quick decisions. against a Man defense, it's a simpler read. against a Zone, it's a more complicated read. Burns suspects that Athan is still having trouble processing certain defenses and that makes him more tentative. against a Man, he can just drop back and let 'er rip.
I have to say that Derek Burns is very good at breaking that type of stuff down and making it understandable. He also went through a fairly detailed breakdown of how Illinois changed its defensive schemes in the 2nd half to shut down the Gopher running game.
For all we know he has injuries he's dealing with...shoulder....legs???Injury from the bowl game against Syracuse could be tweaked/nagging him?
I have to wonder if this is why we rarely run the RPO anymore. At least not nearly as much as we used to. Morgan had his limitations but he was a master at reading it, especially in 2019.on the Gopher Gridiron Podcast, former Gopher OL Derek Burns had an interesting point. He said Athan tends to have the most success against Man defenses, and he struggles more against Zones.
According to Burns, that comes down to being able to read defenses and make quick decisions. against a Man defense, it's a simpler read. against a Zone, it's a more complicated read. Burns suspects that Athan is still having trouble processing certain defenses and that makes him more tentative. against a Man, he can just drop back and let 'er rip.
I have to say that Derek Burns is very good at breaking that type of stuff down and making it understandable. He also went through a fairly detailed breakdown of how Illinois changed its defensive schemes in the 2nd half to shut down the Gopher running game.
I think you hit on the two biggest factors: Fleck needs to commit to developing the passing game, and that definitely means getting a successful, accomplished QB coach at minimum.Many quarterbacks improve dramatically with a combination of experience, better teammates, coaching. It’s an absolute mystery why his mechanics are so awful but maybe it’s just nerves and hearing footsteps. Google says he threw for over 10 ypa and 64% in 2018 season. Obviously against much, much worse defenses but he is capable of completing passes/a decent completion percentage.
I don’t know. He needs help from his team he hasn’t been receiving (as did Morgan), he needs to improve his accuracy and touch - maybe my biggest concern. Tough to even complete the easy 5 yard stuff right now. Processing speed and decisions (it factor) should progress if he’s mentally capable and if he isn’t time to cut losses. Fleck needs to commit to developing the pass game rather than treating it as the red-headed stepchild. The last series versus Illinois was emblematic. Awful. What does AK need to succeed? A new coach? Go get him.
.
The RPO should actually make it easier to read the defense.I have to wonder if this is why we rarely run the RPO anymore. At least not nearly as much as we used to. Morgan had his limitations but he was a master at reading it, especially in 2019.
You have to be able to make a split second decision. He might be struggling with that.The RPO should actually make it easier to read the defense.
Yes and no. With the use of pre snap motion helps make the decision much easier. I think they've moved way from it for the most part.You have to be able to make a split second decision. He might be struggling with that.
Do you have any issue with the defensive call that allowed the cold, backup QB all the time needed to wait for the best WR in the conference other than Harrison to get behind the secondary?Burns (GI, not Derek) and Gaard were both saying that he actually played pretty well against ILL. If you talk about things like “adjusted completion percentage” of 65% (I think that does not count drops), not turning the ball over, having some really nice throws. Think someone posted he had PFF grade in the 90’s, which tries to use advanced analytics to factor everything.
But then yes to @Texan Gopher point … and hell you see this in the NFL too!! … there really just aren’t that many great QB’s. The ones there are go to the helmet schools, and everyone else has to make do with what they can get.
Just again, both defense and offense lost the game on some really frustrating plays where they failed to execute. Get a first down, game is over. Stop ice cold fresh off the bench backup QB on 4th & 11, game is over. Don’t let the best WR in the conference other than Harrison Jr get behind you for a huge TD, game is over. Three swings, three massive misses.
I have more of an issue with our All American safety letting that receiver get behind him.Do you have any issue with the defensive call that allowed the cold, backup QB all the time needed to wait for the best WR in the conference other than Harrison to get behind the secondary?
Recruiting time and money are finite. Coaches need to focus on candidates whom they can hope to get to show up. The premier players are more likely to opt for settings they see as more desirable than UM and Minneapolis.Agreed with OP. Think not recruiting future #1 picks has been a bad strategy
Plenty of blame to go around. Not getting a first on third and one late in the game was the start of the panic. Then memories of NWern must have crept in along with the almost-loss to Iowa on a series of ole tackles during the punt return. The one thing teams must remember is that just because you think the game is over doesn't mean the other guy thinks so.I have more of an issue with our All American safety letting that receiver get behind him.
Recruiting time and money are finite. Coaches need to focus on candidates whom they can hope to get to show up. The premier players are more likely to opt for settings they see as more desirable than UM and Minneapolis.
Why take that risk when pressure up front could have forced a throw way before Williams could run that route?I have more of an issue with our All American safety letting that receiver get behind him.
You think it’s less risky to bring pressure? I’ve never heard that one before.Why take that risk when pressure up front could have forced a throw way before Williams could run that route?
Understood. My comment was not a rebuttal.I was being sarcastic….
That would by itself make it a worthwhile strategy.You think it’s less risky to bring pressure? I’ve never heard that one before.