BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 61,981
- Reaction score
- 18,172
- Points
- 113
Go Gophers!!
Are the Badger boards really boring or something?Rational minds might ask if PJ could not win the West last year with a talented, experienced team and a doable schedule why expect him to do it this year with a more inexperienced team and a more difficult schedule?
National prognosticators like to pick on the Gophers every year after their key players graduate.that is the view from afar - and you can expect to hear that from a lot of the national writers and broadcast crews who have not done a deep dive into the roster.
it goes like this:
Gophers lost their stud RB, starting QB, 3 starting OL, and had several defensive players leave through the portal. the schedule - on paper - is more difficult. ergo, the Gophers will win fewer games this year.
it's quick, easy and doesn't require any work. so again, expect to hear it a lot.
Andy Greder is not a national writer...that is the view from afar - and you can expect to hear that from a lot of the national writers and broadcast crews who have not done a deep dive into the roster.
it goes like this:
Gophers lost their stud RB, starting QB, 3 starting OL, and had several defensive players leave through the portal. the schedule - on paper - is more difficult. ergo, the Gophers will win fewer games this year.
it's quick, easy and doesn't require any work. so again, expect to hear it a lot.
This is still a talented experienced team. What happened last year doesn’t really matter anymore.Rational minds might ask if PJ could not win the West last year with a talented, experienced team and a doable schedule why expect him to do it this year with a more inexperienced team and a more difficult schedule?
Is it wrong?that is the view from afar - and you can expect to hear that from a lot of the national writers and broadcast crews who have not done a deep dive into the roster.
it goes like this:
Gophers lost their stud RB, starting QB, 3 starting OL, and had several defensive players leave through the portal. the schedule - on paper - is more difficult. ergo, the Gophers will win fewer games this year.
it's quick, easy and doesn't require any work. so again, expect to hear it a lot.
I would say 'overly simplistic,' because that viewpoint does not take into account the potential impact of new or replacement players at those positions.Is it wrong?
I've always said it, this team plays up to the challenge. PJ is great at that. We lay eggs against crap competition.I love the tough schedule. Even if it leads to more losses it will be fun. I think our fellas will be very competitive. We need a much better pass rush, and a healthy number eight, to make a West division run
Unfortunately some truth here...hopefully this part of the culture makes it to full self-actualization, like, starting this season...I've always said it, this team plays up to the challenge. PJ is great at that. We lay eggs against crap competition.
Not really a history of that:I've always said it, this team plays up to the challenge. PJ is great at that. We lay eggs against crap competition.
There is literally no truth to this. Since 2019Unfortunately some truth here...hopefully this part of the culture makes it to full self-actualization, like, starting this season...
To add on:This is still a talented experienced team. What happened last year doesn’t really matter anymore.
The numbers certainly tell a good story but the perception still lingers. Purdue last year comes to mind. Granted, we had injuries to deal with but that was a hugely disappointing game.Not really a history of that:
Bowling green is the only non conference loss
In 2022
6-0 against teams sub.500
3-4 against teams .500+
In 2021
5-2 against teams sub.500
4-2 against teams .500+
In 2020
3-2 against teams sub.500
0-2 against teams .500+
In 2019
7-0 against teams sub.500
4-2 against teams .500 or better
Since 2019
21-4 against teams sub.500
11-10 against teams .500 or better
"Rise up to the challenge", doubt many people would use that term to describe playing a .501 teamSince 2019
21-4 against sub.500 teams
11-10 against .500 or better teams
Mo would've played, we would've won.The numbers certainly tell a good story but the perception still lingers. Purdue last year comes to mind. Granted, we had injuries to deal with but that was a hugely disappointing game.
Wisconsin might be the team to beat in the West, but I think we are mentally ready for the Badgers.I've always said it, this team plays up to the challenge. PJ is great at that. We lay eggs against crap competition.
This 100%.I believe, however, that PJ has some kind of mental block with Captain Kirk and Big Bert.
Thanks for agreeing with me as my point was the opposite of the guy making the point the team always rises to the challenge and always lays eggs"Rise up to the challenge", doubt many people would use that term to describe playing a .501 team
He wasn't referring to playing 0.501-0.749 teams. So your stats are false to include those.Thanks for agreeing with me as my point was the opposite of the guy making the point the team always rises to the challenge and always lays eggs