Deleted_User
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2011
- Messages
- 7,831
- Reaction score
- 535
- Points
- 113
Jerry Kill last received a raise in January of 2014 of just about $1.0 x 10[SUP]6[/SUP]. I am not in the least concerned that he may or may not feel right about his recent raise or that he became COY, or that some fanatical friends of Jerry think that a top 45 pay in the country in a field is UNWORTHY of him.
In the United States last year, there were 224,000 athletic coaches in all sports who were paid at least a part-time salary. Jerry Kill is paid in the top 1 tenth of 1 percent of these coaches. That is a fact, not an opinion. I don't care if Nick Saban makes $7 million and Jerry wants to be like Nick. I don't care! The median wage of coaches in the United States is $29,000 annually.
The University is currently constructing a monument to sports with the new athletic village of Olympic, football, and basketball facilities; of which, professors emeritus, alumni, existing faculty, consultants and contractors are currently putting together plans for all these facilities. The current culture of the University and the emerging idea of what the new culture might be is being explored at great time and expense, just so we can compete at very high levels of performance. It is an interesting goal -- the price of which is hopefully not detracting from other extraordinary goals which hope to dovetail into new revenue streams as a result of becoming an elite athletic school. This is an uncertain proposition. If Jerry Kill makes it work as planned, every penny will have been wisely spent and a great big raise will be worthy of the investment. We are not there yet. The evidence is still sketchy, but we are all pulling for a big series of victories, including revenue, donations, and academic success.
To listen to some people on GH speak about money, you would think that it should all go to the coach who only partially is responsible for the success of the program. If the training centers get built, it will be testament to the alumni, staff and state. If recruits find this place inviting, it will be due to the school, the culture of the state, and our desire to have them on board as a community and a bit of Kill and staff. To say that success is only due to the coach from here on out is simply ludicrous. We are all being asked to kick in with higher seat prices, donations, and direct support of the new facilities designs.
There really isn't a debate on what is going to happen. The funds will be raised to develop the sports complex to compete. Talent will follow the investment and directly impact recruiting, coaches will get more victories, the revenue to the school will increase, and then we can evaluate whether or not the rewards met our expectations. We are talking about real large scale sums of money here.
In the United States last year, there were 224,000 athletic coaches in all sports who were paid at least a part-time salary. Jerry Kill is paid in the top 1 tenth of 1 percent of these coaches. That is a fact, not an opinion. I don't care if Nick Saban makes $7 million and Jerry wants to be like Nick. I don't care! The median wage of coaches in the United States is $29,000 annually.
The University is currently constructing a monument to sports with the new athletic village of Olympic, football, and basketball facilities; of which, professors emeritus, alumni, existing faculty, consultants and contractors are currently putting together plans for all these facilities. The current culture of the University and the emerging idea of what the new culture might be is being explored at great time and expense, just so we can compete at very high levels of performance. It is an interesting goal -- the price of which is hopefully not detracting from other extraordinary goals which hope to dovetail into new revenue streams as a result of becoming an elite athletic school. This is an uncertain proposition. If Jerry Kill makes it work as planned, every penny will have been wisely spent and a great big raise will be worthy of the investment. We are not there yet. The evidence is still sketchy, but we are all pulling for a big series of victories, including revenue, donations, and academic success.
To listen to some people on GH speak about money, you would think that it should all go to the coach who only partially is responsible for the success of the program. If the training centers get built, it will be testament to the alumni, staff and state. If recruits find this place inviting, it will be due to the school, the culture of the state, and our desire to have them on board as a community and a bit of Kill and staff. To say that success is only due to the coach from here on out is simply ludicrous. We are all being asked to kick in with higher seat prices, donations, and direct support of the new facilities designs.
There really isn't a debate on what is going to happen. The funds will be raised to develop the sports complex to compete. Talent will follow the investment and directly impact recruiting, coaches will get more victories, the revenue to the school will increase, and then we can evaluate whether or not the rewards met our expectations. We are talking about real large scale sums of money here.