Pointing out how our bench players scored during garbage time of a blowout is a fantastic argument! Outside of that game, our bench has scored a total of 16 points in the 3 games against top 25 Big Ten teams we've played. And they had 14 turnovers in those 3 games. Not good when you have almost as many turnovers as points as a bench.
This point got me thinking, so I decided to do a number crunch. I looked at how the ranked teams in the conference benches did against all top 25 teams they have played to this point. I looked at their Points/Turnover ratio and what the teams win-loss record was during those games. The data came out as so:
Indiana: 3.0 Points/Turnover, Record:2-0
Michigan: 13.6 Points/Turnover, Record: 1-1
Minnesota: 2.6 Points/Turnover, Record: 3-2
Ohio St.: 4.6 Points/Turnover, Record: 1-3
Illinois: 5.7 Points/Turnover, Record: 2-2
Michigan St.: 1.86 Points/Turnover, Record: 1-2
Had our bench scored against Illinois our ratio would have been a little better. Our bench is averaging 15.5 ppg excluding that game, so if we add 15 points to our total our Points/Turnover ratio would have been 3.2. 0 points by our bench in that game was a complete anomaly and won't happen again.
This is what it looks like if we rank the teams by Win/Loss percentage against top 25 teams:
Indiana
Minnesota
Illinois/Michigan
Michigan St.
Ohio St.
Look at Michigan's crazy efficient 13.6 ration, but they are 1-1. Then there is our not so efficient 2.6 ratio, but we are 3-2.
Do with this data as you please. Obviously the data doesn't tell the whole story, because the starters for all these teams are really good and score a lot of points. We also have to realize that we need to look at more than just points to determine how good our bench is, we also need to look at defense and the intangibles that can't be measured.