- Joined
- Nov 3, 2008
- Messages
- 5,215
- Reaction score
- 1,445
- Points
- 113
I'm totally down with that. This is great news for our program! This shows a winning mind-set...we may not be padding our schedules with 4 cupcakes, but I think this is a huge step in the right direction.
I commend the football program in really stepping up their schedule!
I thought getting to a top bowl game to improve our support was a top goal?
Although, we can now add another loss to the schedule!! But at least these will be to a legit team.
The Gophers will play one game in LA in 2011 and the Vikings will play 10 games there in 2012.
Did you get beat up by a Vikings player or something?
What this does as far as a top bowl game goes, is that if we beat USC and have a good record we're a lock. If we lose to them and still have a good record, it's a maybe just as if we had never played them. It's really a no lose situation for us. It can only help, unlikely to hurt.
And if we're comitted to a good program then we' shouldn't be concerned about bowl eligibility. Losing one NC game to improve our team shouldn't make a negative difference.
You tell me what the goal is and I will try to think of ways of accomplishing that goal. It seemed to me that if we want to get to a January bowl game we will want to win some games and build team support. But then, I don't know what your goal is.
From SC's perspective, I think this is the equivalent of the NDSU game for Minnesota. It is basically a no-win situation. From our perspective it is a total win-win. From my perspective, it is a bigger win-win, given that I live in LA.