Two points I want to bring up, and maybe someone who knows better can address and clarify (moreso the first, I'm pretty sure the second is correct).
1) Coyle and Ben Johnson (or Gable and the Regents, for that matter) have no official authority over organizations like Dinkeytown Athletes. There is no official connection between DA and the U's athletic department. Thus, there can be no such thing as dictation from Coyle or BJ to the leadership of DA who make decisions on how much money to offer particular players on the various teams.
Coyle and BJ (and other coaches) are certainly free to express ideas/ideals like "I don't think it's right that an incoming player/recruit, who hasn't done a single thing for us on the field/court/mat/track (whatever) yet should have a larger NIL contract than an All-Conference performer." Free to express that all day long, every day. And I think a lot of good Minnesotans would say "heck ya, doncha know!" to that.
And ..... so??? They can't force DA to do a single thing.
DA could voluntarily choose to respect those wishes, sure.
As far as I know, the school, athletic department, and coaching staffs cannot do either of the following things:
- tell a (prospective) NIL provider that they are not allowed to provide that deal to any particular athlete
- tell a (prospective) NIL receiver that they are not allowed to make any specific deal, or else they're off the team, won't get playing time, etc. *
* there are likely a few, obvious exceptions to this: alcohol, tobacco, firearms or things which go against the University's values, I would suspect could be disallowed within reason.
(this is the part where it would be good to get precise clarity)
2) to my earlier comments about if you had a $1M burning a hole in your pocket and wanted to let it be known that if some hot-shot recruit comes here, they'll get that money in a NIL deal:
if that situation, there is no need at all to go through DA or something of the like. You can just go directly to the player's agent, and do the deal straight up. You don't need a middle-man like a collective.
So the comments about how our collectives are (maybe?) following Coyle/coaches wishes about "spreading around" the money, don't really apply in that case.