First Round on Campus

Donate To GopherHole
I have often argued the Gophers should at some point at least as a one off switch their one "road" non conference game to a "neutral site" game at U.S. Bank Stadium. Each time I have suggested it, I have had to explain to multiple people over and over that I am NOT suggesting replacing a home game at Huntington Bank Stadium. It doesn't matter. People literally argued they'd rather have the Gophers play on the road than in a neutral site game at U.S. Bank stadium. That really surprised me.

Now we have people suggesting moving a HOME playoff game from Huntington Bank Stadium to U.S. Bank Stadium and nobody has a problem with that?
 

Schnauzer said:
I have often argued the Gophers should at some point at least as a one off switch their one "road" non conference game to a "neutral site" game at U.S. Bank Stadium. Each time I have suggested it, I have had to explain to multiple people over and over that I am NOT suggesting replacing a home game at Huntington Bank Stadium. It doesn't matter. People literally argued they'd rather have the Gophers play on the road than in a neutral site game at U.S. Bank stadium. That really surprised me.

Now we have people suggesting moving a HOME playoff game from Huntington Bank Stadium to U.S. Bank Stadium and nobody has a problem with that?
Click to expand...
I for one have a major problem with that idea. Haha
 


Wisconsin played LSU at Lambeau. It would be cool to play a P4 non-conference game at USBank. Alabama is on the schedule.
 

This isn't just a Gopher thing- I'm pretty much vehemently against neutral site college football games in general. There are a couple exceptions based on tradition (Cocktail Party in Jacksonville) but for the most part, they're all shameless money grabs that would be much better off played on campus.
 


MaxyJR1 said:
Wisconsin played LSU at Lambeau. It would be cool to play a P4 non-conference game at USBank. Alabama is on the schedule.
Click to expand...
Would be cooler to see them at HBS


You play a neutral site game if that’s the way you make the game happen.
 

Zeppelin Gopher said:
This isn't just a Gopher thing- I'm pretty much vehemently against neutral site college football games in general. There are a couple exceptions based on tradition (Cocktail Party in Jacksonville) but for the most part, they're all shameless money grabs that would be much better off played on campus.
Click to expand...
so you'd rather the Gophers play AT the opponent location as an away game than in U.S. Bank Stadium as a neutral site game?
 


Schnauzer said:
I have often argued the Gophers should at some point at least as a one off switch their one "road" non conference game to a "neutral site" game at U.S. Bank Stadium. Each time I have suggested it, I have had to explain to multiple people over and over that I am NOT suggesting replacing a home game at Huntington Bank Stadium. It doesn't matter. People literally argued they'd rather have the Gophers play on the road than in a neutral site game at U.S. Bank stadium. That really surprised me.
Click to expand...
Not sure how that would work in practice, but not a horrible idea. Who do you envision them playing? You aren't going to get a major conference school the likes of which would normally demand a home-and-home arrangement (i.e. schools on our future schedules like Mississippi State, California, Alabama) to give up their home game to play at a neutral site in Minneapolis. Maybe someone with a national profile to schedule a one off and share the gate? Maybe one of the military academies?

Schnauzer said:
Now we have people suggesting moving a HOME playoff game from Huntington Bank Stadium to U.S. Bank Stadium and nobody has a problem with that?
Click to expand...
I think most fans who actually attend the games, me included, would have a big problem with that.
 



Sparlimb said:
To be fair, its not like the horrid cold of January would be an advantage for our team who also never plays in it. As a fan, I'd never choose to watch a game in the cold over a dome. But that's me. Doesn't change the point our team would be no more use to it then Georgia...
Click to expand...
That is preposterous. A team that has been walking to class and living in the cold decisions is 100% going to be better equipped to play it than a team from the south
 

Schnauzer said:
I have often argued the Gophers should at some point at least as a one off switch their one "road" non conference game to a "neutral site" game at U.S. Bank Stadium. Each time I have suggested it, I have had to explain to multiple people over and over that I am NOT suggesting replacing a home game at Huntington Bank Stadium. It doesn't matter. People literally argued they'd rather have the Gophers play on the road than in a neutral site game at U.S. Bank stadium. That really surprised me.

Now we have people suggesting moving a HOME playoff game from Huntington Bank Stadium to U.S. Bank Stadium and nobody has a problem with that?
Click to expand...
 

DinkyTownIsDead said:
That is preposterous. A team that has been walking to class and living in the cold decisions is 100% going to be better equipped to play it than a team from the south
Click to expand...
I'm pretty skeptical.

It makes for a great story, but an athlete is still just as good as they are ... hot or cold weather, that goes for both teams.
 

SEC teams are built for speed. Big Ten is historically power running. Why would you voluntarily play a SEC team on artificial grass away from the elements and let them utilize their strength?

Surprised by the number of people that want to play a home game away from the on campus stadium. Hell, let's bring back the dome while we are at it!
 



A_Slab_of_Bacon said:
I'm pretty skeptical.

It makes for a great story, but an athlete is still just as good as they are ... hot or cold weather, that goes for both teams.
Click to expand...
lazy example because it is only one game, but the Miami Dolphins offense looked way different playing in frigid Arrowhead last year. Can't chalk it up all to the weather but I think it would be foolish to claim the weather had no effect on slowing them down.
 

We’ve literally had at least THREE home games where the visiting team has very much looked like they didn’t want to be there DESPITE BEING B1G TEAMS SUPPOSEDLY BUILT FOR THE SAME WEATHER. People grow up hearing tall tales about how cold it is here and it can be a factor if the weather does turn cold.

The Gophers sprung upsets in two of those three games and very nearly changed college football history in the third.

2010 Iowa (can still remember Iowa RB looking like he’d rather head to the tunnel than back to the huddle)
2014 Ohio State (Urban Meyer still talks about nearly losing that day)
2018 Purdue (Purdue looked visibly uncomfortable all day)

These games happened, I saw the opponents struggle with the cold with my own eyes. To say “well there isn’t a difference because our players have to play in the same weather” didn’t watch those three games or forgot about them.

It isn’t a guarantee as there have been other cold games where the opponent wasn’t affected. But, I’d venture to guess it would be more likely to be a factor vs LSU than against Wisconsin.
 

Schnauzer said:
so you'd rather the Gophers play AT the opponent location as an away game than in U.S. Bank Stadium as a neutral site game?
Click to expand...
Yes 100%.

I'd attend either way, but would be much more excited about checking off another campus/CFB stadium than us playing in the antiseptic ZygiDome.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom