upnorthkid
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Messages
- 10,180
- Reaction score
- 5,525
- Points
- 113
there is? was unaware this year's teams played in the Big Ten or SEC. it's the fun part that no we don't actually know that because they didn't play. it's fun you can say that and try infer it comparing random like games, but truthfully you don't. They probably would lose more games yeah becuase simple variance would say that they would.Clemson, SMU, ASU are all about .500 in the Big Ten or SEC. Boise and Notre Dame would have at least three losses (just like Alabama and Ol Miss). There’s enough data out there to know these things.
Why would the Big Ten and SEC want to continue this playoff system?
Get real.
But frankly you've already decided, as a conference, that Bama is at best your 3rd best team based on how you schedule. That was the point behind playoff expansion. Not to put in the 4th and 5th best conference teams but to give everyone access and to see what happens on the field.
it's part of what's wrong in how the CFP mission criteria are written in that what they say they're trying to do makes no sense with next to no cross over data each season. sure you can quote massey rankings and SP+ but then what is the point of playing any game on the field each year? I'm sure Bama's ratings prior to playing Vandy were right in line with what the point spread was
To me I'm more interested in seeing who the best team in the country is and this CFP field does that better in who it includes. If the B10 and SEC want to go hide and play by themselves, think it's going to see a lot of people tune out and hurt their overall revenue/desirability