I disagree. I thoroughly enjoy the pissing contests between various parties about the unchangeable past and the participants' opinions.
LOL! Touché
I disagree. I thoroughly enjoy the pissing contests between various parties about the unchangeable past and the participants' opinions.
I disagree. I thoroughly enjoy the pissing contests between various parties about the unchangeable past and the participants' opinions.
Believe me, Alvarez and Richter took full advantage of the "cupcake" method of building a football program. More power to them. It worked pretty darn well...
It took nine years before Alvarez had a non-conference schedule without a BCS opponent. Grinning Glen accomplished that by his second year and his third year and his sixth year and his seventh year and his eighth year and his ninth year.
Wisconsin played road games at #2 Washington and #7 Colorado in Barry's first four years on the job. In year six, Wisconsin played Colorado and Stanford out of its three non-conference games.
Final statement on this matter:
Glen Mason was a good coach, but NOT a perfect coach.
His teams had strong running games, but for whatever reason, he was not able to back up the running game with an equally strong defense.
His teams won several big games, but they also lost several big games, including a series of heart-breaking losses after blowing big leads in the 2nd half.
Glen Mason also irritated a number of fans through his willingness to entertain/flirt with other job offers, giving the perception that he was not 100% committed to the Gopher program.
The president of the united states is NOT above criticism. Current
The Pope is not above criticism Current
I am not above criticism. Current
Wren is not above criticism, Current and
Glen Mason is NOT above criticism. Past
Here is the paradox of Wren: Wren doesn't respect anyone else's opinion, but he can't understand why we don't respect his opinion. That says it all.
maybe THEN and ONLY then will you have ANY ground to stand on with your criticizing of Glen Mason.
after that failed brewball period any where near as competitive as it was during the Glen Mason Period.
The president of the united states is NOT above criticism.
The Pope is not above criticism
I am not above criticism.
Wren is not above criticism, and
Glen Mason is NOT above criticism.
Here is the paradox of Wren: Wren doesn't respect anyone else's opinion, but he can't understand why we don't respect his opinion. That says it all.
You clearly have a great understanding of that paradox known as wren. Therefore I suggest you become our DL65 for translating wren speak into English like DL65 does for Sid. If you used the following shorthand symbols such as IAABTW = It's all about Big Ten wins and TSNTMNIV = Thou shall not take Mason's name in vain you could summarize most of wren's post with as little as a dozen or more key strokes.
Final statement on this matter:
Glen Mason was a good coach, but NOT a perfect coach.
His teams had strong running games, but for whatever reason, he was not able to back up the running game with an equally strong defense.
His teams won several big games, but they also lost several big games, including a series of heart-breaking losses after blowing big leads in the 2nd half.
Glen Mason also irritated a number of fans through his willingness to entertain/flirt with other job offers, giving the perception that he was not 100% committed to the Gopher program.
The president of the united states is NOT above criticism.
The Pope is not above criticism
I am not above criticism.
Wren is not above criticism, and
Glen Mason is NOT above criticism.
Here is the paradox of Wren: Wren doesn't respect anyone else's opinion, but he can't understand why we don't respect his opinion. That says it all.
A coach has a 32-48 Big Ten record and there are no grounds to criticize him. Seems logical.
Must kill you to know that the failed brewball period of 3+ years produced two seasons equal to Grinning Glen's 10th season as head coach of the program. Way to build that program Glen.
You are too full of short ornery Norwegian "know it all..." If I contrast someone's opinion I could care diddly squat what that person thinks about my opinion. You are saying NOTHING about me Norwegian...absolutely NOTHING. You don't know me at all. So YOU people who you refer to as your "we" like to operate in group-think and group-speak. I have noticed that. And, I really don't care. I'll state my opinion and let the chips fall where they may. I say what I think and I really don't care what you think about what I say. That works out pretty well...because I don't think I'd really care to think or say many of the things you say, think and attempt to convey to others Norwegian...even though I am of Norwegian descent myself.
I think for myself Norwegian. I don't do this "we-think-thing" that you and the others you and your friends band together to do. Or, do you always just refer to yourself as "we..." IF you ever get to a game, let me know, I'd even buy you and your we people a beverage. It would be fun to talk about this face to face. I will be at every home game except the San Jose State game. Just let me know IF you will be at any home games and we can talk this thing out. You have a LOT of misconceptions about me...and I may have some about you.
But, do NOT try to explain anything about who I am when you have never even had the decency to talk face to face with me.
Deal Norwegian? I am the Walrus...but...I am Norwegian too!
Well...it's time to go. You and your little buddies can feel free to say what ever you feel you can get by with. I really don't care. It's all good. Opinions are great...and contrast is even greater!
Later Norwegian!
; 0 )
Being There.
While Mason was undoubtedly better than Brewster, the issue wasn't that Mason shouldn't have been fired but rather that Brewster was the wrong choice as his replacement. The U of M and Maturi badly botched that key hire and set the football program back years in the process. Hire the right guy after Mason and we're not having this conversation.
I always felt like Maturi rolled the dice with Brewster because he felt like he had the "credit" to work with after bringing in Tubby (which he had little to do with). Maybe I'm wrong and maybe the timeline is even wrong but that's the way I remember it. Maturi thought he could go out on a limb with that one because he was riding the positive momentum of the Tubby hire.
While Mason was undoubtedly better than Brewster, the issue wasn't that Mason shouldn't have been fired but rather that Brewster was the wrong choice as his replacement. The U of M and Maturi badly botched that key hire and set the football program back years in the process. Hire the right guy after Mason and we're not having this conversation.