The guy I was responding to?Who cares??
And apparently you since you posted
The guy I was responding to?Who cares??
As PJ said this week:For like the 100th time, there is no incentive to play a team like them. It does nothing for recruiting. Yeah Colorado ended up being very bad but when that game was scheduled it was a different story. It was scheduled in 2016 around the time they went 10-4 and went to the Alamo Bowl. If they want a challenging game, they're going to schedule a power 5 opponent. Beating NDSU does nothing. Losing to them would be bad.
Every team schedules a few creampuffs.
So never schedule a team your sure you can beat up on...talk about boring football! Don't schedule NDSU because they might embarrass you.That isn't an upside for the gophers
As I said, if we win, it's yawn
if we lose, it's bad
it also helps Dakotas get exposure here in MN for recruiting
There is no upside to playing Dakota's.
But, as I said, I wouldn't object to the occasional matchup, I just have no interest in making it a regular thing as NDSU fans already think there is some sort of "rivalry" when there is none
Like Bowling Green?For like the 100th time, there is no incentive to play a team like them. It does nothing for recruiting. Yeah Colorado ended up being very bad but when that game was scheduled it was a different story. It was scheduled in 2016 around the time they went 10-4 and went to the Alamo Bowl. If they want a challenging game, they're going to schedule a power 5 opponent. Beating NDSU does nothing. Losing to them would be bad.
Every team schedules a few creampuffs.
What does that have to do with the discussion? Yeah that shouldn't have happened but it was a cupcake that should have resulted in a blowout. That extreme situation doesn't change the fact that scheduling NDSU has no upside.Like Bowling Green?
For like the 100th time, there is no incentive to play a team like them. It does nothing for recruiting. Yeah Colorado ended up being very bad but when that game was scheduled it was a different story. It was scheduled in 2016 around the time they went 10-4 and went to the Alamo Bowl. If they want a challenging game, they're going to schedule a power 5 opponent. Beating NDSU does nothing. Losing to them would be bad.
Every team schedules a few creampuffs.
Boring! But then it pumps up the record.What does that have to do with the discussion? Yeah that shouldn't have happened but it was a cupcake that should have resulted in a blowout. That extreme situation doesn't change the fact that scheduling NDSU has no upside.
The upside to playing a team like Bowling Green or W Illinois is a very good chance of an easy win where lots of players can get into the game.
Or we could schedule a real school, in a fertile recruiting ground that we aren't competing with for our PWO classes.Or prove to be a worthy challenge.
Just curious how many Gophers in the NFL compared to NDSU?Or we could schedule a real school, in a fertile recruiting ground that we aren't competing with for our PWO classes.
Beating them doesn't really get us anything.
Losing to them make their year.
The spotlight ONLY helps them.
I'll pass.
Just curious why you're asking me completely irrelevant questions?Just curious how many Gophers in the NFL compared to NDSU?
Do you really not get it or is this just a bit at this point?? I hope it is a bit, because if you really don't understand that would be pretty sad.Boring! But then it pumps up the record.
If not NDSU then why not someone who would push them,?
Guarantee NDSU would be 3 - 0 playing Gophers non conference schedule.
All schools do it, if Gophers want to schedule a challenging game, they should schedule another P5 school, not NDSUSo never schedule a team your sure you can beat up on...talk about boring football! Don't schedule NDSU because they might embarrass you.
And most years gophers would be 12-0 playing NDSU's scheduleBoring! But then it pumps up the record.
If not NDSU then why not someone who would push them,?
Guarantee NDSU would be 3 - 0 playing Gophers non conference schedule.
You mean like North Carolina or Nevada or Fresno State or TCU or Miss State or...Boring! But then it pumps up the record.
If not NDSU then why not someone who would push them,?
Guarantee NDSU would be 3 - 0 playing Gophers non conference schedule.
Colorado has been a competent football program in the past. Gophers playing them when they suck is not the Gophers fault.You mean like North Carolina or Nevada or Fresno State or TCU or Miss State or...
probably mel tuckers fault . . .Colorado has been a competent football program in the past. Gophers playing them when they suck is not the Gophers fault.
Yes because Drake and NC A&T are juggernauts.So never schedule a team your sure you can beat up on...talk about boring football! Don't schedule NDSU because they might embarrass you.
Just curious why you're asking me completely irrelevant questions?
The game does NOTHING for the U, it does EVERYTHING for NDSU. That's the point.
(If you really need an answer, we have 15 and they have 10).i
If teams like Gophers don't want to schedule them what can they do.Yes because Drake and NC A&T are juggernauts.
Everyone does it.
So you're essentially admitting the FCS is a joke because all the other teams are bad? Their only options are "teams like Gophers"?If teams like Gophers don't want to schedule them what can they do.
I think he long since talked himself into a corner and tried to pivot to whatever he wanted to get folks to say ... and now is out in the weeds / lost.So you're essentially admitting the FCS is a joke because all the other teams are bad? Their only options are "teams like Gophers"?
You still made about Humphrey and Lindbergh?old man complaint:
I don't like FBS and FCS. go back to 1-A and 1-AA. that worked fine for years. there was no need to change it.
and, technically it's incorrect. FBS schools do play for a championship, and in a few years, the playoffs will be expanding.
why should 1-AA schools get to call themselves the "championship" sub-division simply because they have more teams in their playoff system?
I also think it's misleading. the "Championship" sub-division makes it sound like it's the top division.
"We play for a Championship - the other guys only play in Bowl games."
bad idea all around.
Agree, Cal as well. All those listed Gophs have played or will be playing. Lining up other P5 and quite a few G5 opponents is not that easy, thuse the scheduling years out. They have been scheduling tough nonconference schools, just not for every game. I think the mix is good.Colorado has been a competent football program in the past. Gophers playing them when they suck is not the Gophers fault.
Ask Iowa.So you're essentially admitting the FCS is a joke because all the other teams are bad? Their only options are "teams like Gophers"?
Nothing you say makes any sense.Ask Iowa.
Are you calling me Biden!Nothing you say makes any sense.
CFPL. College Football Premier league. CFML. College Football Minor League, or CFAR, College Football Also Rans.old man complaint:
I don't like FBS and FCS. go back to 1-A and 1-AA. that worked fine for years. there was no need to change it.
and, technically it's incorrect. FBS schools do play for a championship, and in a few years, the playoffs will be expanding.
why should 1-AA schools get to call themselves the "championship" sub-division simply because they have more teams in their playoff system?
I also think it's misleading. the "Championship" sub-division makes it sound like it's the top division.
"We play for a Championship - the other guys only play in Bowl games."
bad idea all around.
Who cares? It's their problem. Why are you concerned about what is in the best interests of our potential opponents?If teams like Gophers don't want to schedule them what can they do.
Love the David versus Goliath match up.Who cares? It's their problem. Why are you concerned about what is in the best interests of our potential opponents?
Like the Western Illinois game?Love the David versus Goliath match up.