This doesn't look like an NCAA team to me, so I voted no. Just too many times where they didn't get the job done. Things might change in the Big Ten Tournament, but I doubt it.
Having said that, I went into the season thinking an NIT bid would have been a sign of a successful transition year.
$hit, now we have no chance to get a bid. Damn.
Yep, because I'm the final word. Glad you realized it.
Go back to getting drunk and then get back to me.
How dare you state your opinion. Who do you think you are?
This doesn't look like an NCAA team to me, so I voted no. Just too many times where they didn't get the job done. Things might change in the Big Ten Tournament, but I doubt it.
Having said that, I went into the season thinking an NIT bid would have been a sign of a successful transition year.
It's all about how this team looks in comparison to the other bubble teams. Each of these bubble teams have had their ups and downs. Whether we get in will depend on the criteria used. SOS plays in our favor as does top end wins. Road/neutral record could keep us out.
Win two and we are likely in. Beat PSU and we'll need some help.
I think the biggest thing that will be a strike will be the 8-10 conference record. In the past, selection committees haven't looked very favorably on teams with losing conference records in at large situations. I agree that if they win two, they probably get in. If not, we're on the outside looking in imo. A lot depends on how other conference tournaments go as well, mostly from the power conferences. Can't afford to have too many upsets (unless it's the Gophers doing the upsetting).
This doesn't look like an NCAA team to me, so I voted no. Just too many times where they didn't get the job done. Things might change in the Big Ten Tournament, but I doubt it.
Having said that, I went into the season thinking an NIT bid would have been a sign of a successful transition year.
Pretty sure we had the same conference record last year and got in as an 11 seed.
True, but during one of the games last week, an announcer informed the audience that only one team with consecutive conference losing records (a Virginia team in the nineties) received consecutive tournament bids. Last year's team also finished the nonconference season 12-1 with some good quality wins and I believe they had a measurably higher RPI than this team at the end of the season. I think there might be a bit too much competition from teams in other power conferences this year. I'm not even 100% positive that 2 wins in the Big Ten tournament will do it for them.
If we don't win two, I think it really comes down to how much slack we're given for Dre's injury. There's no doubt in my mind that we would have beaten NW and Purdue if he was healthy. It feels like OK State is being given a lot of slack for the games Marcus Smart missed, even though that wasn't an injury. If they treat us the same, maybe we have a better shot than we think. FWIW, I'm not really up on whether any other buble teams have similar claims.
Jerry Palm claims the committee won't take into account his injury.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Another piece of meaningless drivel.
Good lord, what did he say that wasn't true?
Saw that too and know they have always factored in injuries before and don't know why they wouldn't in our situation. Especially considering that was one of our bad losses and both games were very close if the committee actually does factor in the injury I would feel a lot more comfortable about where we stand right now.Jerry Palm claims the committee won't take into account his injury.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Jerry Palm claims the committee won't take into account his injury.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk