Its all opinions here, so we can argue what we want. I think that the fact that we got zero sacks (correct me if that's wrong), suggests that we did not get much pressure on that guy. Further, if their QB can easily escape our pass rush I don't think that we pressured him all that much. When leading by 3 at the end of the game we were one play away from winning the game, we knew that they had to pass, we get and interception we win (I'm 95% confident that we win under THAT ASSUMPTION). Without a pass rush that does not happen. Not only do we not pressure him, he takes off on a 35-yard run. Anyway, I don;t know if Devers would have made a difference, but I think with a QB sack at a key time, he would have made a difference. Again, I MIGHT AND COULD WELL BE WRONG, no one can say, either way, with any authority.