gophersfan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 5,131
- Reaction score
- 689
- Points
- 113
Wow. The glass half empty view must suck.This feels like another year of "well we don't love the QB/WR room so we're going to be 4th in the country in runs per game behind the service academies". Added 3 rb to Taylor plus a blocking TE. We might be very boring next year. Not saying we can't be successful but not a lot of 48-45 games.
Why, you worried about losing them already?unless I'm really addled, that makes 3 RB transfers.
I hope they have a plan to use them.
I mean, or its an attempt to improve what was a relatively lackluster running game from this past year and has nothing to do with the coaches perception of how good our QBs and WRs are going to be next year . . . .This feels like another year of "well we don't love the QB/WR room so we're going to be 4th in the country in runs per game behind the service academies". Added 3 rb to Taylor plus a blocking TE. We might be very boring next year. Not saying we can't be successful but not a lot of 48-45 games.
We added 3 RBs last year even with Taylor and Nubin coming back. And 2 of those 3 were one and done guys. This year 2 of 3 have more than one year of eligibility left. The moves aren’t always just for one year.This feels like another year of "well we don't love the QB/WR room so we're going to be 4th in the country in runs per game behind the service academies". Added 3 rb to Taylor plus a blocking TE. We might be very boring next year. Not saying we can't be successful but not a lot of 48-45 games.
We took three backs in the portal last year as well. I don't think it means what you think it meansThis feels like another year of "well we don't love the QB/WR room so we're going to be 4th in the country in runs per game behind the service academies". Added 3 rb to Taylor plus a blocking TE. We might be very boring next year. Not saying we can't be successful but not a lot of 48-45 games.
I dont get this thinking, the rb depth chart seems very normal now.This feels like another year of "well we don't love the QB/WR room so we're going to be 4th in the country in runs per game behind the service academies". Added 3 rb to Taylor plus a blocking TE. We might be very boring next year. Not saying we can't be successful but not a lot of 48-45 games.
Never ceases to amaze me how some people are always expecting bad things to happen. Seems like it would suck to live life as a pessimist but to each their own I guess.Wow. The glass half empty view must suck.
What an odd take after the day today, which includes WR talent btw
Also, have you met PJ? We're not play 48-45 games lmao. He's a complimentary style coach. Gonna shorten the game and run the ball. Throw in short passing to the backs like this year. Shit, 35-31 maybe you could hope for. 27-21 is probably PJs bread n butter
I looked this up when he was a recruit, I believe it’s just a really weird coincidence.Any relation to wrestler Colt Cabana?
I think your takes are all dumb too, let's call it even .Never ceases to amaze me how some people are always expecting bad things to happen. Seems like it would suck to live life as a pessimist but to each their own I guess.
You need to have a little conviction in your opinions. You clearly thought it was a negative. You implied we are doing it because of a failure in recruiting other positions and I don’t think you meant it as compliment when you compared our offense to the service academies. Now, I disagree with you and that’s okay but stop pretending that you weren’t implying this was a negative. That’s not how men should act.I think your takes are all dumb too, let's call it even .
Never once did I say this was a negative, we are screwed, dumb, etc move. I was making an observation that we added 3 RB recently who appear to be ready to produce guys. Along with a stud RB coming back logic dictates we are going to be more run heavy than this year with Brosmer DJ Spencer etc. That's no issue at all, I am good with that, simply a note. Chill hardo's....
"well we don't love the QB/WR room"I think your takes are all dumb too, let's call it even .
Never once did I say this was a negative, we are screwed, dumb, etc move. I was making an observation that we added 3 RB recently who appear to be ready to produce guys. Along with a stud RB coming back logic dictates we are going to be more run heavy than this year with Brosmer DJ Spencer etc. That's no issue at all, I am good with that, simply a note. Chill hardo's....
Edit for reference: run % last 3 years, 66% 60% 47%. I think we trend closer to 60% this year with these moves. Sorry for making an observation, I guess I hit a nerve
Couldn't have summarized it better, thank youYou need to have a little conviction in your opinions. You clearly thought it was a negative. You implied we are doing it because of a failure in recruiting other positions and I don’t think you meant it as compliment when you compared our offense to the service academies. Now, I disagree with you and that’s okay but stop pretending that you weren’t implying this was a negative. That’s not how men should act.
As to the point of your post, i think we might be more run heavy next season because we lost our QB, best two WR and one of the best LTs in college football, but I just not at all see how you can tie that into this signing.
Two of the RBs we signed are known for catching passes and we essentially have our starter, big back (guy from wazzou) and 2-3 guys are going to fight for 2RB snaps. I think our running back room is better but similar in depth to last year.
I apologize for all comments. We will be the best team in the country next year. It will be unfair how we have the best two quarterbacks in the country. We will be the first team in history to have all 4 Heisman finalists. Javon Tracy will be compared to Randy Moss. #CONVICTIONYou need to have a little conviction in your opinions. You clearly thought it was a negative. You implied we are doing it because of a failure in recruiting other positions and I don’t think you meant it as compliment when you compared our offense to the service academies. Now, I disagree with you and that’s okay but stop pretending that you weren’t implying this was a negative. That’s not how men should act.
As to the point of your post, i think we might be more run heavy next season because we lost our QB, best two WR and one of the best LTs in college football, but I just not at all see how you can tie that into this signing.
Two of the RBs we signed are known for catching passes and we essentially have our starter, big back (guy from wazzou) and 2-3 guys are going to fight for 2RB snaps. I think our running back room is better but similar in depth to last year.
Dude...you were being negative. Just own it. You can be negative if you want. Just don't expect everyone to agree with your opinion.I apologize for all comments. We will be the best team in the country next year. It will be unfair how we have the best two quarterbacks in the country. We will be the first team in history to have all 4 Heisman finalists. Javon Tracy will be compared to Randy Moss. #CONVICTION
observations that aren't glowingly positive don't have to be negative. I think it's fair to say adding Pyron means the staff isn't sold 100% on Lindsey. That by no means says he cant be really really good, but I'd hazard a guess we don't get Pyron if Brosmer was atop the QB chart. I'm on record saying I actually like Pyron more than most in limited duty at GT I thought he was a nice piece.
I made a point we added a lot of good RB talent, logic would dictate we'd want to use that talent more. I like the Tracy add too, so I'm not implying we will throw for 45 yards a game. Shesh some of you are blow hards....