If it has any limited merit, it is only late in the game when you have a two score lead. It is foolish when you are trailing and not even smart in a close game.I agree that focusing on TOP doesn't improve scoring. I think the intent is to limit the opponent's opportunity to score thus enhancing the difference between your score and your opponent's score -- thus winning. Deliberate offenses are not fan favorites, they annoy fans, especially younger fans. But to me, there's nothing more frustrating than watching your opponent eat up the clock with glacial 80 yard drives. So when my team does that, I love it.
Another point (and BTW, I enjoy this civil discussion about pace, thank you for it) I think UM's play style considers two factors of this program. We play outdoors in the worst weather city in the conference, so rushing is treasured. (I wonder how the pass/rush ratio in the 'Dome compared to outdoors now). And given that climate and the other recruiting negatives of the Twin Cities, it might be that this type of offense is what can be most effective with the players we can attract. Having said all that, I'd like to see more passing this Saturday.. It started to look better last Saturday, so maybe the players and coaches will have more confidence in it. Regards.
All proponents of hiding the ball from the opponent automatically assume that you are going to have multiple 80-90 yard drives that end in a TD. If you have that kind of dominance running and you get out in front, fine. Then it becomes smart.
We are not in any position to dominate the good teams in the league in that fashion on a consistent basis. To run most downs and dominate you are assuming your front five, six, or seven (two tight ends) can keep blocking nine guys.