Brilliant open letter from the MN Epilepsy Foundation President to Jim Souhan

supadupafly

Active member
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
3,181
Reaction score
1
Points
36
The following is an open letter from Brett Boyum, President of the Board of Directors for the Epilepsy Foundation of Minnesota (Mr. Boyum is also Vice President of Marketing at Marvin Windows), to Star Tribune columnist Jim Souhan, who in a Sunday column said it was time for University of Minnesota football coach Jerry Kill to step aside.

Souhan had noted that Kill, who has epilepsy, suffered his fourth game-day seizure on Saturday. The incident has sparked conversation about whether Kill can be an effective coach, or whether he should resign. U of M Athletic Director Norwood Teague on Monday morning said, “Jerry is our coach. We are 100 percent behind him.” Kill is expected at practice Monday.

Here’s Boyum’s letter:

Mr. Souhan, I get your gig. You are a columnist. A columnist’s role (how you help gain readership and sell papers) is to create controversy, openly discuss issues that people are afraid to talk about, and in some cases take a position that no one else wants to take.

As a columnist you have liberty that a reporter does not in the sense that you can write from an opinion perspective rather than a fact perspective. It’s strictly entertainment, not news.

Unfortunately, in your Sunday column regarding Coach Kill you moved from an opinion writer who entertains to a writer who cast a stone (relatively speaking, in this case, a boulder) that lacked knowledge, information, sensitivity, and dare I say humanity: in short, ignorance.

It is difficult for me to write this letter without emotion. You see, I have Epilepsy and my son has Epilepsy. To read a statement that says “No one who buys a ticket to TCF Bank Stadium should be rewarded with the sight of a middle-aged man writhing on the ground” harkens to antiquated judgments made 100 years ago. The truth is Mr. Souhan, no one who has been graced with a ticket to life should have to lie on the ground writhing. But, the reality is 60,000 of us here in the state of MN endure seizures. None of us stop pushing toward our personal goals and knocking down the barriers that stand in our way, including opinions like yours.

Thus, I am choosing to write this letter as a professional with Epilepsy – instead of that emotional husband, dad, brother, son, and friend who has Epilepsy – because I have a much larger mission in life. I am proud to serve the 60,000 children, teens, and adults who have Epilepsy as the President of the board of directors for the Minnesota Epilepsy Foundation. WE will someday find a way to prevent or cure seizures. Until then, WE will do everything in our power to ensure all people with seizures realize their full potential, whether that be a student, a doctor, a cook, a teacher, a mechanic, a Big 10 football coach, or a CEO. I believe this because I am fortunate to have support (like Coach Kill) and the same relentless drive to overcome that epitomize many of us with Epilepsy. In addition to my volunteer role on the board, I currently serve as a Vice President of Marketing for a local company – yes, I’m in a leadership role and I have Epilepsy!

I also choose not to debate whether you have the medical credentials to determine if Coach Kill is healthy enough to coach; or, if stress is the reason for his seizures; or, if the job is further damaging his health. You don’t and it’s unfortunate that you choose to make these unfounded judgments and falsely influence many others’ perspectives of Epilepsy.

I would, however, like to address the more insulting comments you make in your column that single-handedly set back years of efforts by many in the community and medical field to debunk myths and remove the public stigma surrounding Epilepsy.

First, the football program and the University did not become a subject of pity or ridicule. In fact, I’d say the coverage nationally by ESPN, Big 10 Network, and others were very professional and of genuine concern for Coach Kill. Your perception of pity and ridicule is either a case of sensationalism to drive an ulterior motive or you have such preconceived notions of how the public might respond that it distracted you from the reality of the moment. This is important to note because those two attributes are exactly what those of us with Epilepsy do not want; especially pity. We fight ridicule regularly but that is petty to pity. Pity means you don’t think we can make a difference. Those of us with Epilepsy, including Coach Kill, can and are making a difference. A big difference.

Next, you argue that Coach Kill cannot continue coaching because his public seizures damage his leadership reputation, the program’s reputation, his ability to coach, and the willingness of fans to support the team. Let me paint a brief picture of the faces of Epilepsy. It’s an infant whose parents are terrified every time their child seizes, it’s a student who has a seizure in school in front of their teachers, coaches, and friends; it’s a CEO of a company who has a seizure while traveling, visiting with employees, or presenting to their investors; it’s a mom who endures multiple seizures in front of her children; It’s me in front of the board of directors, peers, our customers; you get the picture. What is the definition of public? The student having a seizure in front of his friends is more public to him than Coach Kill having a seizure on the football field in front of 40,000 fans. Are we to tell that student he shouldn't be in school and he will never realize his goals because he will be bring ridicule and pity to himself, his family and his school? Should I let my dreams of being a successful business person, role model, community leader, and father extinguish and seclude myself in a dark room so as not to bring pity and ridicule to my family, co-workers, and community? I can tell you that the 60,000 of us in MN and all our family, doctors, and social networks will not let jaded and ignorant opinions like yours stand in our way of success; however each of us may define success to our individual situations.

We cannot control whether our seizures are in public or private environments. To stereotype those of us with Epilepsy as incapable of leadership, inspiration, or even productivity because the public nature of a seizure could create pity and ridicule is narrow minded. Statements like you write in your column are the very reason the Epilepsy Foundation of Minnesota develops programs like Seizure Smart schools, businesses, and communities. These programs educate the public on how to respond and support someone that may have a seizure in a public environment. It also provides confidence to those of us with seizures to achieve. More importantly, these programs demonstrate that seizures are an obstacle, but on the other side of that obstacle is a bright, intelligent, passionate individual with no boundaries to achieving success and inspiring/leading others, despite what you may judge as our capabilities.

There is much more to say. The unfortunate dilemma I now face is do I continue to point out the inappropriate and inaccurate statements in your column to defend a person with Epilepsy and their ability to chase dreams, be successful, and lead or do I move on? I’m moving on. I’m moving on to stand tall and tell the world that I am part of an incredible organization and a group of people affected by Epilepsy who are out to realize our full potential. I’m moving on to create positive opportunities for those with Epilepsy rather than defend our potential against the ill-willed opinions of a few.

Mr. Souhan, if you really want to learn the truth about Epilepsy and understand the meaning of living each day to its fullest I give you an open invitation to visit our organization and those that we serve. Instead of a column that worries about pity and ridicule, maybe you can then write a column on inspiration, leadership, determination, service, and humanity – and how those of us with Epilepsy use our situation to foster and demonstrate all these great characteristics.
 

36243-slow-clap-citizen-kane-orson-w-bJkI.gif


The following is an open letter from Brett Boyum, President of the Board of Directors for the Epilepsy Foundation of Minnesota (Mr. Boyum is also Vice President of Marketing at Marvin Windows), to Star Tribune columnist Jim Souhan, who in a Sunday column said it was time for University of Minnesota football coach Jerry Kill to step aside.

Souhan had noted that Kill, who has epilepsy, suffered his fourth game-day seizure on Saturday. The incident has sparked conversation about whether Kill can be an effective coach, or whether he should resign. U of M Athletic Director Norwood Teague on Monday morning said, “Jerry is our coach. We are 100 percent behind him.” Kill is expected at practice Monday.

Here’s Boyum’s letter:

Mr. Souhan, I get your gig. You are a columnist. A columnist’s role (how you help gain readership and sell papers) is to create controversy, openly discuss issues that people are afraid to talk about, and in some cases take a position that no one else wants to take.

As a columnist you have liberty that a reporter does not in the sense that you can write from an opinion perspective rather than a fact perspective. It’s strictly entertainment, not news.

Unfortunately, in your Sunday column regarding Coach Kill you moved from an opinion writer who entertains to a writer who cast a stone (relatively speaking, in this case, a boulder) that lacked knowledge, information, sensitivity, and dare I say humanity: in short, ignorance.

It is difficult for me to write this letter without emotion. You see, I have Epilepsy and my son has Epilepsy. To read a statement that says “No one who buys a ticket to TCF Bank Stadium should be rewarded with the sight of a middle-aged man writhing on the ground” harkens to antiquated judgments made 100 years ago. The truth is Mr. Souhan, no one who has been graced with a ticket to life should have to lie on the ground writhing. But, the reality is 60,000 of us here in the state of MN endure seizures. None of us stop pushing toward our personal goals and knocking down the barriers that stand in our way, including opinions like yours.

Thus, I am choosing to write this letter as a professional with Epilepsy – instead of that emotional husband, dad, brother, son, and friend who has Epilepsy – because I have a much larger mission in life. I am proud to serve the 60,000 children, teens, and adults who have Epilepsy as the President of the board of directors for the Minnesota Epilepsy Foundation. WE will someday find a way to prevent or cure seizures. Until then, WE will do everything in our power to ensure all people with seizures realize their full potential, whether that be a student, a doctor, a cook, a teacher, a mechanic, a Big 10 football coach, or a CEO. I believe this because I am fortunate to have support (like Coach Kill) and the same relentless drive to overcome that epitomize many of us with Epilepsy. In addition to my volunteer role on the board, I currently serve as a Vice President of Marketing for a local company – yes, I’m in a leadership role and I have Epilepsy!

I also choose not to debate whether you have the medical credentials to determine if Coach Kill is healthy enough to coach; or, if stress is the reason for his seizures; or, if the job is further damaging his health. You don’t and it’s unfortunate that you choose to make these unfounded judgments and falsely influence many others’ perspectives of Epilepsy.

I would, however, like to address the more insulting comments you make in your column that single-handedly set back years of efforts by many in the community and medical field to debunk myths and remove the public stigma surrounding Epilepsy.

First, the football program and the University did not become a subject of pity or ridicule. In fact, I’d say the coverage nationally by ESPN, Big 10 Network, and others were very professional and of genuine concern for Coach Kill. Your perception of pity and ridicule is either a case of sensationalism to drive an ulterior motive or you have such preconceived notions of how the public might respond that it distracted you from the reality of the moment. This is important to note because those two attributes are exactly what those of us with Epilepsy do not want; especially pity. We fight ridicule regularly but that is petty to pity. Pity means you don’t think we can make a difference. Those of us with Epilepsy, including Coach Kill, can and are making a difference. A big difference.

Next, you argue that Coach Kill cannot continue coaching because his public seizures damage his leadership reputation, the program’s reputation, his ability to coach, and the willingness of fans to support the team. Let me paint a brief picture of the faces of Epilepsy. It’s an infant whose parents are terrified every time their child seizes, it’s a student who has a seizure in school in front of their teachers, coaches, and friends; it’s a CEO of a company who has a seizure while traveling, visiting with employees, or presenting to their investors; it’s a mom who endures multiple seizures in front of her children; It’s me in front of the board of directors, peers, our customers; you get the picture. What is the definition of public? The student having a seizure in front of his friends is more public to him than Coach Kill having a seizure on the football field in front of 40,000 fans. Are we to tell that student he shouldn't be in school and he will never realize his goals because he will be bring ridicule and pity to himself, his family and his school? Should I let my dreams of being a successful business person, role model, community leader, and father extinguish and seclude myself in a dark room so as not to bring pity and ridicule to my family, co-workers, and community? I can tell you that the 60,000 of us in MN and all our family, doctors, and social networks will not let jaded and ignorant opinions like yours stand in our way of success; however each of us may define success to our individual situations.

We cannot control whether our seizures are in public or private environments. To stereotype those of us with Epilepsy as incapable of leadership, inspiration, or even productivity because the public nature of a seizure could create pity and ridicule is narrow minded. Statements like you write in your column are the very reason the Epilepsy Foundation of Minnesota develops programs like Seizure Smart schools, businesses, and communities. These programs educate the public on how to respond and support someone that may have a seizure in a public environment. It also provides confidence to those of us with seizures to achieve. More importantly, these programs demonstrate that seizures are an obstacle, but on the other side of that obstacle is a bright, intelligent, passionate individual with no boundaries to achieving success and inspiring/leading others, despite what you may judge as our capabilities.

There is much more to say. The unfortunate dilemma I now face is do I continue to point out the inappropriate and inaccurate statements in your column to defend a person with Epilepsy and their ability to chase dreams, be successful, and lead or do I move on? I’m moving on. I’m moving on to stand tall and tell the world that I am part of an incredible organization and a group of people affected by Epilepsy who are out to realize our full potential. I’m moving on to create positive opportunities for those with Epilepsy rather than defend our potential against the ill-willed opinions of a few.

Mr. Souhan, if you really want to learn the truth about Epilepsy and understand the meaning of living each day to its fullest I give you an open invitation to visit our organization and those that we serve. Instead of a column that worries about pity and ridicule, maybe you can then write a column on inspiration, leadership, determination, service, and humanity – and how those of us with Epilepsy use our situation to foster and demonstrate all these great characteristics.
 

I read that letter with chills down my spine. What a unbelievable, class-filled, absolute response to Jim Souhan.
 


Really a very touching response to Souhan. (Souhan started a $hit storm and his phony apology only made it worse.)
 


This conversation is becoming unproductive due to hyperbole (or worse) from all sides.

I hope Jerry shows everybody that he can successfully coach while being epileptic. My fingers will be crossed.
 


This conversation is becoming unproductive due to hyperbole (or worse) from all sides.

I hope Jerry shows everybody that he can successfully coach while being epileptic. My fingers will be crossed.

Are you saying that the letter was unproductive?
 

It seems there are a number of people in the media who don't realize just how big of a hornets' nest has been kicked. The real story is now about the TC media, semi-apologies, aka "I'm sorry if you're offended" may not be enough to put this behind them. If it was just more potshots at the Gophers, it would be one thing, but it is a lot bigger than that.
 



It seems there are a number of people in the media who don't realize just how big of a hornets' nest has been kicked. The real story is now about the TC media, semi-apologies, aka "I'm sorry if you're offended" may not be enough to put this behind them. If it was just more potshots at the Gophers, it would be one thing, but it is a lot bigger than that.

RR, I sure hope you are right about this. The TC media needs some turnover, and hopefully this jackassery (is that a word?) by Souhan can get that ball rolling.
 

It seems there are a number of people in the media who don't realize just how big of a hornets' nest has been kicked. The real story is now about the TC media, semi-apologies, aka "I'm sorry if you're offended" may not be enough to put this behind them. If it was just more potshots at the Gophers, it would be one thing, but it is a lot bigger than that.

Yep. I was talking to one of my co-workers (not a Gophers fan) about what Souhan said, quoting the article, and he was shocked. The first thing out of his lips after I quoted him was "has he been fired yet?" If someone at my workplace had said that about a client or another employee, they would have been out on their ass in a heartbeat or at least suspended and enrolled in some type of sensitivity class (as I'm guess would be the response at most workplaces). Somehow, because it's sports, it becomes okay to say.

Hopefully Souhan does some self-reflecting and learns from this mistake.
 

This conversation is becoming unproductive due to hyperbole (or worse) from all sides.

I hope Jerry shows everybody that he can successfully coach while being epileptic. My fingers will be crossed.

BS! The only side being unproductive are the Souhans of the world and those arguing Jerry has to move to the booth.
 

Wow. I wish I could write so eloquently. I'm hoping Jim and others like him will take something from this letter and learn a little from it.
 



BS! The only side being unproductive are the Souhans of the world and those arguing Jerry has to move to the booth.

And I have not seen a heart filled apology from Studwell55 for that asinine thread he started. How about it, Studmeister?
 

Wow! What a magnificent rebuttal to those like Souhan and others who spew their uniformed venom regarding Epilepsy and one's ability to function in society. Now it remains to be seen if the Strib has the cahunas to give Souhan the disciplinary action he richly deserves. I'm not holding my breath.
 

You can function in society with epilepsy. No question. Does it impair your ability to do certain jobs? Yes. Does it impair your ability to be a big ten football coach? Depends on if you think not being able to attend all the games is a material impairment. I suppose some level of missing games is acceptable. The question is where is that level. The souhan discussion has become a big distraction from the true issue.
 

Excellent well written response. I hope Soupcan gets the hint that everyone is tired of his act as well as other unnamed members of the media. I think this letter goes to a few posters here as well.
 





The letter is brilliant. The tone is perfect.
 

The letter is brilliant. The tone is perfect.

I couldn't agree more. This response letter was a 600 foot home-run. My writing emulation radar was perked up too, as I'm always looking for writing styles and cues to adopt into my own style when the content and tone is this good. Well done Mr. Boyum.
 


The kicker is that KMSP tried to get a comment from him and he couldn't be bothered to reply. He ripped Teague for not addressing the situation immediately, but the man who is now the focal point of statewide outrage thanks mostly to his insensitive words has no comment. And he says the U knows nothing about PR.
 

The kicker is that KMSP tried to get a comment from him and he couldn't be bothered to reply. He ripped Teague for not addressing the situation immediately, but the man who is now the focal point of statewide outrage thanks mostly to his insensitive words has no comment. And he says the U knows nothing about PR.

great point. +1. and since i know you read this board souhan, just like your buddy pat reusse does, you should probably take note on this little PR lesson that breakin' the plane just gave you. :p
 

I read that letter with chills down my spine. What a unbelievable, class-filled, absolute response to Jim Souhan.

This. What a beautifully written logical letter, that probably took 100 times more thought and time than the original column by Souhan did.
 


The kicker is that KMSP tried to get a comment from him and he couldn't be bothered to reply. He ripped Teague for not addressing the situation immediately, but the man who is now the focal point of statewide outrage thanks mostly to his insensitive words has no comment. And he says the U knows nothing about PR.

No reply to KMSP, didn't show at Teague's presser....will he be there today for the presser? Will he make an appearance on Saturday at the Bank? What about for the Big Ten opener against a border rival? Will he magically be assigned to the Twins road trip?
 

Souhan intended to stir up controversy and hopefully force people to lose their livelihood, because that's the garbage human being he is. Instead it has had the effect of galvanizing our fans like I've rarely seen before. I'm now rallying even more fervently for Jerry to succeed, if for no other reason than to make Souhan and his ilk feel even smaller and more pathetic than they already are.
 

Souhan intended to stir up controversy and hopefully force people to lose their livelihood, because that's the garbage human being he is. Instead it has had the effect of galvanizing our fans like I've rarely seen before. I'm now rallying even more fervently for Jerry to succeed, if for no other reason than to make Souhan and his ilk feel even smaller and more pathetic than they already are.

I had the same thought - both on the fan base rallying around Kill/against Souhan and wanting Kill to succeed that much more as a result.

Go Gophers!!
 




Top Bottom